Length of Line between 2 Points on Circle

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle Lenght
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of the length of a chord in a circle, particularly in relation to its comparison with the arc length subtended by the same angle. Participants explore the mathematical relationships and transformations between chord lengths and arc lengths, including the implications of infinitesimal changes.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks for the name of the shortest distance between two points on a circle, which is identified as a chord by others.
  • A participant expresses confusion about the transformation from an infinitesimal chord to an infinitesimal arc, citing its use in physics and mathematics.
  • The participant provides a derivation for the length of a chord and attempts to relate it to the arc length, suggesting that the differential relationship is only accurate for small angles.
  • Another participant points out that the limit identity involving sine is relevant to the discussion, indicating that the ratio of chord length to arc length approaches 1 as the angle approaches 0.
  • There is a clarification regarding the relationship between the angle and the chord length, with a suggestion that the original derivation may have overlooked this dependency.
  • A later reply confirms the correctness of the initial calculations while also addressing misunderstandings about the relationships discussed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the derivation and relationships between chord lengths and arc lengths, with some affirming the correctness of calculations while others challenge the assumptions made. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the precise nature of the relationships and the conditions under which they hold.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the assumptions made about the relationships between angle, chord length, and arc length, particularly concerning the conditions under which the approximations are valid.

quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
Hi,

I'd like to know the name for the length in a circle that I will describe:

Consider 2 arbitrary points lying on the perimeter of a circle. I'm talking about the shortest distance distance between these those points. (i.e. the straight line joining them.)

Thx
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It's called a chord.
 
Yep, a chord.
 
Ok, I have a confusion involving a cord. In physics, we often make the transformation from an infinitesimal cord to an infinitesimal arc: d(cord) = d(arc). And I think it's used in some math proofs too.

For exemple, imagine a position vector [itex]\vec{r}(t)[/itex] of fixed norm, rotating around the z axis (i.e. [itex]\vec{\omega} = \omega \hat{z}[/itex]). Let's say the radius of the circle described by the motion of its tip/head/arrow is R. After a time [itex]\Delta t[/itex], it has rotated an angle [itex]\omega \Delta t[/itex] and then they (the manuals) say that it can be seen that when [itex]\Delta t[/itex] is small, [itex]||\Delta \vec{r}||[/itex] (which is a cord), is very near the length of the arc [itex]\Delta s[/itex] subtended by the angle [itex]\omega \Delta t[/itex], and thus, poof, [itex]||d\vec{r}|| = ds[/itex].

And while this seems to be true intuitively, I have never seen a proof of this statement. And when I try to do it, here's what I get:

I start from a cercle of radius R and a cord [itex]\delta[/itex] subtended by an angle [itex]\theta[/itex]. I find that the length of the cord is given by

[tex]\delta = 2Rsin\left(\frac{\theta}{2}\right)[/tex]

Therefor,

[tex]d\delta=Rcos\left(\frac{\theta}{2}\right)d\theta[/tex]

While

[tex]ds=rd\theta[/tex]

So

[tex]d\delta=cos\left(\frac{\theta}{2}\right)ds[/tex]

A result indicating that even the differential version is just an approximation because only true for a principal angle [itex]\theta=0[/itex].
 
Last edited:
it follows from the identity

[tex]\lim_{\theta \rightarrow 0} \frac{\sin \theta}{\theta} = 1[/tex]

Also, the mistake in your derivation is that theta is a function of the chord length.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for your reply StatusX

StatusX said:
it follows from the identity

[tex]\lim_{\theta \rightarrow 0} \frac{\sin \theta}{\theta} = 1[/tex]
At which point does that identity fit in?


StatusX said:
Also, the mistake in your derivation is that theta is a function of the chord length.

Could you elaborate?
 
Sure,if "y" is a function of "x",then "x" is a function of "y",right??So he basically didin't say anything new...You were right,though...Your calculations were corrrect.I guess u knew that,but u have my confirmation...

Daniel. :smile:
 
quasar987 said:
At which point does that identity fit in?

A chord of length 2 R sin(theta) is subtended by an angle of 2 theta (in radians) and so has an arclength of 2 R theta. The identity means d(chordlength)/d(arclength) = 1.

Could you elaborate?

I'm sorry, I just glanced at your last step and assumed you had forgotten that if arclength is 0, then theta must be as well. You did forget that, but for a different reason. What you derived is how an chord of finite length changes with an infinitessimal change in arclength. What you wanted was the ratio of a differential chord to the differential arclength it subtends. To get the differential you're looking for, just take theta=0.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K