Simple Power Equations Gone Wrong

  • Thread starter Thread starter DaVinci
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of power in electrical circuits, specifically the application of the power equation P=IV and the conventions for determining whether power is being absorbed or delivered by circuit elements. Participants explore various scenarios involving positive and negative current and voltage, and the implications for power calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion over the conventions for determining power absorption and delivery, particularly when dealing with negative current and voltage.
  • Another participant asserts that negative power cannot exist, suggesting that negative voltage must accompany negative current.
  • A participant refers to textbook examples where only one value is negative, indicating that the sign of power indicates whether it is absorbed or supplied, yet struggles with consistency in applying this understanding.
  • One participant clarifies that the signs are arbitrary and that a negative current indicates the current flows opposite to the defined reference direction, leading to a negative voltage in their example.
  • Another participant shares a personal convention of using negative power to denote power provided by sources and positive power for power absorbed by resistors, while acknowledging that physically negative power does not exist.
  • A later reply reiterates the previous point about using negative power for sources while cautioning against further complicating the original poster's confusion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit disagreement regarding the existence and interpretation of negative power, with some asserting it cannot exist while others find it useful in their conventions. The discussion remains unresolved as participants present differing views on the conventions and implications of power calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various conventions and interpretations of signs in power calculations, indicating a potential lack of consensus on definitions and the implications of negative values in the context of power in electrical circuits.

DaVinci
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
I like to think of myself as pretty smart and on the ball with the electrical stuff. But I am having trouble figuring out this one concept with power and it seems really simple. I am probably just over thinking the whole thing as usual. Hopefully someone can give me some insight.

In my Circuit Analysis (Elecrical Networks) class, we just covered power, P=IV, and all the stuff about how to figure out if an element is absorbing or delivering power. What we have been told is the following:

When current goes from + to -, Pabs = +VI and Pdel = -VI
When current goes from - to +, Pabs = -VI and Pdel = +VI

This seems pretty simple... you have 2A going into a element from + to - and the voltage on the terminals is 5V. (5)(2) = 10. Since the answer is positive, there is 10W power being absorbed.

Then we say that in the same case it is -2A. So, (-2)(5) = -10W. Here is where things start to get crazy. Current is going from + to - still... but then you can say that -2A from + to - is like 2A from - to +. This would then be correct with 10W Absorbed.

But when things really hit the fan is when we get a problem like this:

You have -2A going from + to - and the absorbed power is 6W. What is the voltage across the terminals?

Well, from P=IV we know that V=P/I. So, 6W/-2A = -3V. But if you have -2A going from + to -, then you have 2A going from - to +. So power abs needs to be -VI in this case...

I think I just confused myself again. Do you see my plight? I think I know it... it is just getting jumbled up in over thinking.

If you can answer the following questions, I would be grateful.

What is the convention to use to determine the power in an element and whether it is being absorbed or delivered?

How would you use the same convention to determine either Voltage or Current given the power and one or the other quantity listed.

Thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You CANNOT have negative power. When you have a negative voltage you will also have a negative current.
 
There are questions in my textbooks and notes that show only one of those values as being negative, leading to a negative answer for P=IV. It is my understanding that the sign on P tells you whether or not the power is absorbed or supplied... yet the answer to that continues to escape me depending on which direction the current is in and such.
 
The + and - signs are an arbitrary reference, and so is the direction of the current. When you state that the positive reference of the current is from + to -, you have associate references. In your example of a -2 A going from + to -, what you are really saying is that your current goes in the opposite sense of your reference, so you have a +2 A going from - to + in your chosen reference. Since power is being absorbed, your voltage must be -3 V. This means that the potential in your terminal labelled - is greater than the potential labelled +.
 
For the person who said there cannot be negative power--- I like to actually use negative power when finding out what sources PROVIDE power to the circuit, and positive power for power absorbed by resistors (considering P = iiR is always positive). Just my way of using convention... but you are correct when in a physical sense there cannot be negative power.
 
Theelectricchild said:
For the person who said there cannot be negative power--- I like to actually use negative power when finding out what sources PROVIDE power to the circuit, and positive power for power absorbed by resistors (considering P = iiR is always positive). Just my way of using convention... but you are correct when in a physical sense there cannot be negative power.

I considered that but decided not to confuse the OP any farther than he already was.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K