Decay of Roe Meson: Conservation Laws Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter K8181
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decay Meson
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the decay processes of the rho meson in particle physics, specifically examining which decay modes are allowed or forbidden based on conservation laws. The original poster is seeking clarification on the conservation laws relevant to these decays, particularly in relation to charge, spin, and parity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of conservation laws, including charge, spin, and parity, on the allowed and forbidden decay modes of the rho meson. There is a focus on understanding how these conservation laws apply to the specific decay processes mentioned.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights into the potential role of spin and parity in the decay processes. The original poster has expressed uncertainty about these concepts, and there is ongoing exploration of the relationship between the rho meson and pions in terms of their quark configurations.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes a lack of familiarity with the conservation laws discussed in class, indicating a need for foundational understanding in particle physics. There is also mention of the rho meson being a spin 1 particle, which may influence the discussion on allowed decay modes.

K8181
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I just started a class in particle physics this semester, and I really need help on one of our first homework problems. We are supposed to show that while the following decays are allowed:

roe(+) --> pi(0)pi(+)
roe(-) --> pi(0)pi(-)
roe(0) --> pi(+)pi(-)

the following decay is not allowed:

roe(0) --> pi(0)pi(0)

I am pretty sure the reason is that it violates a conservation law, but I don't know which one. We have barely touched on what quantities are conserved in lecture. I can see that charge is conserved in all cases, so no problem there.

We are also told that the roe meson is a spin 1 particle, so I think that should play a role. However, the part of quantum mechanics that dealt with angular momentum and spin was a bit treacherous for me. Any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This all sounds pretty fishy to me... Oh perhaps you mean [itex]\rho[/itex] that is rho!

You might benifit by reading This thread.
 
Fantastic! I am already familiar with LaTex.
 
For anyone reading this thread, that link was just about using LaTex for math symbols...I still REALLY need help with this problem!

:biggrin:
 
I'm not an expert in particle physics, but have you checked

1.) spin
2.) parity

I think rho mesons have both their quark and antiquark aligned, whereas pions have them antiparallel so one rho can't make two pions.
 
From what I have deduced, I think the culprit is parity. Could you explain what you know about parity? I have always found it a mysterious concept.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K