Rotational Motion. Apparently, I have no idea what I'm doing.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the rotational motion of a thin long cylindrical rod with mass M, radius R, and length l, initially rotating with angular momentum L. The initial kinetic energy (Ke) is expressed as Ke = (L^2)/(MR^2), derived from the moment of inertia I = (1/2)MR^2. The participants explore how the system can lower its energy while maintaining constant angular momentum, noting that this involves changing the mass distribution without external torque. The ratio of final to initial energy and the criteria for considering the rod "thin and long" are also examined.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rotational dynamics and angular momentum
  • Familiarity with the moment of inertia for different shapes
  • Knowledge of kinetic energy in rotational systems
  • Basic principles of conservation laws in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the moment of inertia for a thin long rod
  • Learn about the conservation of angular momentum in closed systems
  • Explore the relationship between mass distribution and rotational kinetic energy
  • Investigate the conditions for classifying objects as "thin" in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on rotational motion and dynamics, as well as anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of angular momentum and energy conservation principles.

baby_bunny_bee
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
ok... We were given the following question... (I apologize for it's length... please bear with me)

A thin long cylindrical rod (mass M radius R and length l) is initially rotating about its long axis with angular momentum L. There are no external forces or torques however interestingly Ke is usually not conserved.
a) Express the initial Ke of the system in terms of M R l and L
b) Describe how the system can lower its energy while maintaining constant angular momentum.
c) Calculate the ratio of the final to initial energy
d) How thin does a rod of radius R have to be at least so that one can consider it as "thin and long"

Ok. First of all... I have no idea what the formula is for a thin long rod about it's long axis. (The only formulas I can find are for through the cm and perpendicular to the long axis) so I assumed I = 1/2 MR^2 (inertia for a solid cylinder). If that's right, I get Ke = (L^2)/MR^2
And that's fine. Except that I don't have an l term. Which means that when I go to do part d... I can't find the ratio of l to R necessary.
Also I have no idea what the "final" energy would be because I have no idea how MUCH Ke is lost based on the question...

Any help you can give would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks!
Nicola
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Find the moment of inertia of the rod about its axis of rotation, then use the formula for the rotational kinetic energy of a spinning rigid body in terms of L and I (the moment of inertia).

For b): Think of the analogous situation of an iceskater spinning a pirouette. If the arms are outstretched and pulled inwards towards the body the spinning will speed up. Angular momentum is conserved, but the rotational energy increases.
 
baby_bunny_bee said:
a) Express the initial Ke of the system in terms of M R l and L...so I assumed I = 1/2 MR^2 (inertia for a solid cylinder).
That's right. And rotational kinetic energy is:

[tex]KE = \frac{1}{2}I\omega^2 = \frac{1}{2}L^2/I = \frac{L^2}{MR^2}[/tex]
so you are right.
b) Describe how the system can lower its energy while maintaining constant angular momentum.
A system can change its energy by changing the distribution of its mass (ie. by increasing the distance of its mass from the axis of rotation, the kinetic energy would be lowered). I don't see how that can be done here. If you wanted to change its orientation, and thereby transfer some of its angular momentum to another axis of rotation, you would have to apply an external torque. (you could lower its temperature, but I think they are asking about kinetic energy).
c) Calculate the ratio of the final to initial energy
This question makes sense only if you can change the moment of inertia. But I don't know how you can do that with a cylindrical rod without applying an external torque.
d) How thin does a rod of radius R have to be at least so that one can consider it as "thin and long"
R>>l ?? Beats me. The question makes sense if you are talking about electrical charge, but not moment of inertia.

AM
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
3K
Replies
67
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K