Partial Differentiation: What is the Chain Rule and How to Work It Out?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Zurtex
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Partial
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of partial differentiation, specifically focusing on the chain rule and its application. Participants seek clarification on notation and methods related to partial derivatives, including specific examples and theoretical underpinnings.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests an explanation of the chain rule in partial differentiation and provides a formula for its application.
  • Another participant questions the relevance of prime numbers to the topic of partial derivatives, suggesting a misunderstanding.
  • Clarification is provided regarding the notation for second-order partial derivatives, with references to the order of differentiation.
  • There is a discussion about whether the order of partial differentiation operators commutes, with one participant asserting that it does not always hold true, citing examples.
  • Participants express confusion over the notation involving the variable "g" in the context of a given equation, leading to further discussion about functional dependence.
  • One participant expresses frustration over the lack of clarity in the lecture material and the need for further explanation from the instructor.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the commutation of partial derivatives, with differing opinions on the validity of the claim. Additionally, there is no agreement on the interpretation of the variable "g" in the context of the provided equation.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the absence of specific definitions or context for the variables involved in the problems presented, which contributes to the confusion. There is also mention of differing educational backgrounds affecting understanding.

Zurtex
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
1,118
Reaction score
1
Hi hi, due to no fault of my own I have ended up missing 2 of my lectures on partial differentiation. I have a friend who takes amazing note but unfortunately my lecturer only seems to go through examples rather than standard methods and formulas.

So could you please help me with a few things?

What is the chain rule in partial differentiation?

How do you work out the below?

[tex]\frac{ \partial g}{\partial x} \quad \text{for} \quad x^2 + y^2 = r^2[/tex]

And what do these mean please: [itex]F_{xx} \quad \text{and} \quad F_{xy}[/itex]

Thanks for any help you can give.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Zurtex said:
Hi hi, due to no fault of my own I have ended up missing 2 of my lectures on partial differentiation. I have a friend who takes amazing note but unfortunately my lecturer only seems to go through examples rather than standard methods and formulas.

So could you please help me with a few things?

If they don't involve prime numbers :rolleyes: ,i think i can help... :-p

Zurtex said:
What is the chain rule in partial differentiation?

Basically this one:
[tex]z=z(x(u,v),y(u,v)) \Rightarrow \frac{\partial z}{\partial u}=\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}\frac{\partial x}{\partial u}+\frac{\partial z}{\partial y}\frac{\partial y}{\partial u}[/tex]

and similar for "v"...I hope u can see the generalization for an arbitrary no.of functions & variables...

Zurtex said:
How do you work out the below?

[tex]\frac{ \partial g}{\partial x} \quad \text{for} \quad x^2 + y^2 = r^2[/tex]


Give it a try using the formula i gave u...


Zurtex said:
And what do these mean please: [itex]F_{xx} \quad \text{and} \quad F_{xy}[/itex]

That's the Lagrange notation for partial derivatives...In the Jacobi notation:
[tex]F_{xy}=\frac{\partial^{2} F}{\partial x \partial y}[/tex]

Daniel.

Thanks for any help you can give.[/QUOTE]
 
Prime numbers?

dextercioby said:
If they don't involve prime numbers :rolleyes: ,i think i can help... :-p

Prime numbers? I'm hesitant to challenge you but I don't think prime numbers have anything to do with partial derivatives.
 
Thanks dextercioby, lol.

Just one more question then, what does this mean:

[tex]\frac{\partial^{2} F}{\partial x \partial y}[/tex]
 
:smile: :smile: It's a famous thread in the HS homework section... :-p

So yes,u didn't know what i was referring to...

Daniel.
 
Zurtex said:
Thanks dextercioby, lol.

Just one more question then, what does this mean:

[tex]\frac{\partial^{2} F}{\partial x \partial y}[/tex]

That's the notation for the second order partial derivative of the function F wrt the variables "y" and "x",viz.

[tex]\frac{\partial^{2} F}{\partial x \partial y}=:\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\frac{\partial}{\partial y} F[/tex]

,where i designated specifically the order of the PD operators...In general,they commute (Schwarz's theorem)...

Daniel.
 
I'm going to take a guess that:

[tex]\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\left(\frac{\partial F}{\partial y} \right) = \frac{\partial}{\partial y}\left(\frac{\partial F}{\partial x} \right)[/tex]

Right?
 
Not always.Any respectable mathematician knows at least one example of function for which the PD operators do not commute...

Daniel.
 
dextercioby said:
Not always.Any respectable mathematician knows at least one example of function for which the PD operators do not commute...

Daniel.
:rolleyes: Yeah thanks, the first time I saw them in my life was on monday and I've missed all subsequent lectures on them since and due to personal problems haven't even give them the time of day to think about them.
 
  • #10
dextercioby said:
...In general,they commute (Schwarz's theorem)...
*cough*Clairaut's theorem*cough*

Ofcourse, the same theorem can have different names...

Zurtex said:
I'm going to take a guess that:

[tex]\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\left(\frac{\partial F}{\partial y} \right) = \frac{\partial}{\partial y}\left(\frac{\partial F}{\partial x} \right)[/tex]

Right?

If [itex]F_{xy}[/itex] and [itex]F_{yx}[/itex] are both continuous on a disk D containing the point (a,b), then [itex]F_{xy}(a,b)=F_{yx}(a,b)[/itex].
 
  • #11
That's because your were taught mathematics in one place & me in another...
Anyway,i'll check up on Clairaut... :wink:

Daniel.
 
  • #12
[tex]\frac{ \partial g}{\partial x} \quad \text{for} \quad x^2 + y^2 = r^2[/tex]

That really makes no sense at all because there is no "g" in your equation!
 
  • #13
It doesn't unless:
[tex]g=g(r(x,y))[/tex]

where the functional dependence
[tex]g(r)[/tex]

is given...

Daniel.
 
  • #14
HallsofIvy said:
That really makes no sense at all because there is no "g" in your equation!
That's what my friends notes have and I'm told that's the problem our lecturer gave, he's also asked us to partially differentiate a whole bunch of stuff without giving what variable with respect to what variable. I rather imagine a lot of the time they really have no idea what they are going on about (at least some of them), you can usually tell which ones don’t because they don’t offer support like the rest.

Edit: Oh and we were given no g(r)=... we were just asked:

[tex]\frac{ \partial g}{\partial x} \quad \text{for} \quad x^2 + y^2 = r^2[/tex]

and that alone. Oh well, I'll go back and ask him to go over it again to see if he does know what he is writting.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K