Engineering students take Aerospace engineering

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the reasons why fewer engineering students choose Aerospace Engineering compared to Mechanical and Electrical Engineering at universities. It explores the specialization of Aerospace Engineering and its implications for career opportunities and perceived difficulty.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that Aerospace Engineering is more specialized than Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, which may limit job opportunities for graduates in the former field.
  • Others propose that the difficulty of Aerospace Engineering may deter students, with one participant questioning whether it is indeed harder than Mechanical and Electrical Engineering.
  • A participant argues that in the UK, Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering courses are very similar, with differences primarily in specialization areas.
  • Concerns are raised about the cyclical nature of the aviation industry, which may affect job stability for Aerospace engineers.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that Aerospace Engineering is more specialized, but there is disagreement regarding the perceived difficulty of the field compared to Mechanical and Electrical Engineering. The discussion remains unresolved on whether the difficulty is a significant factor in students' choices.

Contextual Notes

There are assumptions about the job market and the nature of engineering courses that may not be universally applicable. The discussion does not resolve the complexities of specialization versus generalization in engineering fields.

EngTechno
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
Why do only a few engineering students take Aerospace engineering where as many of those take Mechanical and Electrical engineering at the Universities?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Aerospace Engineering, like Nuclear Engineering, is more specialized, as opposed to Mechanical and Electrial Engineering, which are more generalized.

A mechanical or electrical engineer has opportunities at many more companies than say an Aero or Nuke engineer. On the other hand, one could do Aero and ME or EE - as in a double major. It might be worthwhile if one is really interested in Aero, but wants the diversity of ME or EE.
 
Astronuc said:
Aerospace Engineering, like Nuclear Engineering, is more specialized, as opposed to Mechanical and Electrial Engineering, which are more generalized.

A mechanical or electrical engineer has opportunities at many more companies than say an Aero or Nuke engineer. On the other hand, one could do Aero and ME or EE - as in a double major. It might be worthwhile if one is really interested in Aero, but wants the diversity of ME or EE.
I think Aerospace engineering is harder than ME and EE. This is one of the reason why many students don't take this subject. Is this right? What do you think of it?
 
Astronuc said:
Aerospace Engineering, like Nuclear Engineering, is more specialized, as opposed to Mechanical and Electrial Engineering, which are more generalized.

A mechanical or electrical engineer has opportunities at many more companies than say an Aero or Nuke engineer. On the other hand, one could do Aero and ME or EE - as in a double major. It might be worthwhile if one is really interested in Aero, but wants the diversity of ME or EE.

Your avatars are driving me crazy!. I would never think you're a nuclear engineer with "esas pintas". :smile:
 
EngTechno said:
I think Aerospace engineering is harder than ME and EE. This is one of the reason why many students don't take this subject. Is this right? What do you think of it?

Utter rubbish, at least in the UK. Aero & Mech courses are extremely similar, obviously the aeros specialise more in aeronautical systems and aerodynamics, mechs cover more materials science and manufacturing.

As far as the reason fewer students take aero, the answer has already been given, - it's a more specialised field.
 
brewnog said:
Utter rubbish, at least in the UK. Aero & Mech courses are extremely similar, obviously the aeros specialise more in aeronautical systems and aerodynamics, mechs cover more materials science and manufacturing.

As far as the reason fewer students take aero, the answer has already been given, - it's a more specialised field.


I completely agree. In addition you take into account the serious cyclical nature of the aviation business and the real possibility of picking up and moving from job to job.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K