Is This Integration Method Correct for Exponential and Polynomial Functions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter courtrigrad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around integration methods for exponential and polynomial functions, specifically focusing on substitution and integration by parts techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various integration techniques, including substitution and integration by parts, questioning the correctness of their methods and results.

Discussion Status

Some participants confirm the validity of certain integration methods, while others express confusion about the appropriate techniques to use. There is ongoing exploration of different approaches, and hints are provided without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants note constraints regarding the requirement to use substitution rather than integration by parts for certain problems. There are also discussions about the proper formatting of logarithmic expressions in LaTeX.

courtrigrad
Messages
1,236
Reaction score
2
[tex]\int 2e^{2x} dx[/tex] Ok so I know that [tex]\int e^{u} du = e^{u} + C[/tex]. So we have [tex]2\int e^{2x} dx[/tex]. Now [tex]u = 2x, du = 2dx[/tex]. So [tex]dx = \frac{1}{2} du[/tex]. So now we have [tex]\int e^{2x} du = e^{2x} + C[/tex] Was my method correct?

[tex]\int e^{2x} dx[/tex] Ok for this [tex]u = 2x, du = 2dx[/tex]. So [tex]dx = \frac{1}{2} du[/tex]. So we have [tex]\frac{1}{2}\int e^{2x} du = \frac{1}{2} e^{2x} + C[/tex]. Is this correct?

[tex]\int 5x^{3}e^{x^{2}} dx[/tex] So [tex]u = x^{2} du = 2xdx[/tex].
 
Physics news on Phys.org
first one yes,, can be verified by taking derivative of solution and seeing if you get back the integrand

second one is good too, just a constant multiple of first.

for third use integration by parts (hint: let [itex]u = x^2[/itex] and [itex]dv = x e^{x^2}[/itex])
 
Last edited:
Ok so [tex]\int 5x^{3}e^{x^{2}} dx[/tex] so [tex]u = x^2[/tex] which means [tex]du = 2xdx[/tex]. Does this mean that [tex]\frac{1}{2}\int e^{x^{2}} (2xdx) = \frac{1}{2} e^{x^{2}} + C[/tex] ?
 
the formula for integration by parts is given by

[tex]\int u dv = uv - \int v du[/tex]

so for this case letting
[tex]u = x^2 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (1)[/tex]
[tex]du = 2x dx \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (2)[/tex]

and
[tex]dv = x e^{x^2}dx \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (3)[/tex]
[tex]\int dv = \int x e^{x^2}dx \ \ \ \ \ \ (4)[/tex]

making the substitution [itex]w = x^2[/itex] in (4) and solving for v you get
[tex]v = \frac{1}{2} e^{x^2}[/tex]

plugging it all into the equation for separation of variables then

[tex]\int 5 x^3 e^{x^2} dx = 5[\frac{1}{2} x^2 e^{x^2} - \int 2x \frac{1}{2} e^{x^2} dx][/tex]

try to do the rest
 
however we are supposed to do substitution not parts

also is:

[tex]\int \frac{1}{x+1} dx = \Ln(x+1) + C[/tex]?
[tex]\int \frac{1}{3-2x} dx = \frac{-1}{2} \Ln(3-2x) + C[/tex]
[tex]\int \frac{e^{2x} + e^{x} + 1}{e^{x}} = e^{x} -e^{-x} + x + 2C[/tex]?
 
Last edited:
You can't do it by substitution only.U have to apply part integration as well...

Daniel.
 
courtrigrad said:
however we are supposed to do substitution not parts

also is:

[tex]\int \frac{1}{x+1} dx = \ln(x+1) + C[/tex]?
[tex]\int \frac{1}{3-2x} dx = \frac{-1}{2} \ln(3-2x) + C[/tex]
[tex]\int \frac{e^{2x} + e^{x} + 1}{e^{x}} = e^{x} -e^{-x} + x + 2C[/tex]?

note: improper format for natural log in latex

hint: try taking the derivative of your solutions, and see if they match the integrand
 
Last edited:
What happened to the logarithms...? :confused:

Is that
[tex]\int \frac{dx}{xx} =\int \frac{dx}{x^{2}} [/itex]<br /> <br /> ?<br /> <br /> Daniel.[/tex]
 
HINT:[tex]d(\ln x)=\frac{dx}{x}[/tex]

Daniel.
 
  • #10
actually it is [tex]\int \frac{1}{x\ln x}[/tex] Ok so [tex]\int \frac{\ln x}{x} dx[/tex]. So [tex]u = \ln x[/tex] and [tex]du = \frac{1}{x} dx[/tex]. That means [tex]dx = xdu[/tex]. Is this correct?

Also for [tex]\int \frac{e^{2x} + e^{x} + 1}{e^{x}} = e^{x} -e^{-x} + x + 2C[/tex] I just divided through. Is this correct?

Thanks
 
Last edited:
  • #11
If u put the "dx" in the integral,then yes... :smile:

Daniel.
 
  • #12
Are u talking about the same integral??

[tex]\int \frac{dx}{x\ln x} \neq \int -\ln x \frac{dx}{x}[/tex]

Daniel.
 
  • #13
Ok so for [tex]\int \frac{1}{x\ln x}[/tex] should I rewrite or just make [tex]u = \ln x[/tex]?

Thanks :smile:
 
  • #14
1.Put the "dx"... :-p
2.Yes,make that substitution.

Daniel.
 
  • #15
ok so i got [tex]du = \frac{1}{x} dx[/tex] [tex]dx = xdu[/tex]. So now do I bring the x out in the front?I know the answer is [tex]\ln(\ln(x)))[/tex]

thanks
 
Last edited:
  • #16
no need to do [tex]dx=xdu[/tex]. just substitute straight from [tex]\frac{1}{x}dx=du[/tex].

edit: add a [tex]+C[/tex] to [tex]ln(lnx)[/tex].

- kamataat
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K