Can contour integration always be used to solve integrals?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter secret2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the use of contour integration for solving the integral \(\int_{0}^\infty \frac{x}{(x^2+c^2)^3} dx\). Initially, the attempt to solve it using contour integration resulted in zero, leading to the realization that a simple variable substitution is more effective. The consensus is that while contour integration is a powerful technique, it is not always the most efficient method for every integral, particularly when simpler alternatives exist.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of contour integration techniques
  • Familiarity with variable substitution in integrals
  • Knowledge of complex analysis fundamentals
  • Experience with evaluating improper integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of variable substitution in integrals
  • Explore advanced contour integration techniques and their applications
  • Learn about the conditions under which contour integration is applicable
  • Investigate other methods for evaluating improper integrals
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of complex analysis, and anyone interested in integral calculus techniques will benefit from this discussion.

secret2
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
I am trying to do the integration

[tex]\int_{0}^\infty \frac{x}{(x^2+c^2)^3} dx[/tex]


At first I tried doing it with contour integration, but yielded zero. Later I figured out that it can actually be done simply by making a change in variable (squeezing the x in the numerator into the dx). Is it possible to do it with contour integration (though not necessary)?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
secret2 said:
I am trying to do the integration

[tex]\int_{0}^\infty \frac{x}{(x^2+c^2)^3} dx[/tex]


At first I tried doing it with contour integration, but yielded zero. Later I figured out that it can actually be done simply by making a change in variable (squeezing the x in the numerator into the dx). Is it possible to do it with contour integration (though not necessary)?

Since it doesn't have real poles (thre denominator does not cancel in R),why didn't u try to do it only by the obvious substitution.I'm sure the result will not be awkward.

Daniel.
 


It is not always possible to solve an integral using contour integration. In fact, contour integration is a powerful technique that can be used to evaluate many complex integrals, but it is not always the most efficient method. In this case, it may be easier to make a change of variable to solve the integral rather than using contour integration. However, it is always good to explore different methods and techniques when solving integrals, as it can help to deepen our understanding of the problem and potentially provide alternative solutions. So while it may not be necessary in this case, it is always beneficial to try out different approaches.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K