Please help with Simple Harmonic motion

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a system exhibiting simple harmonic motion, specifically focusing on the differential equations governing the motion of a mass attached to two springs. Participants are exploring the relationship between the motion of the mass and the parameters of the springs, including their spring constants and lengths.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to derive the differential equation for the position of the mass based on the given equation of motion. There are discussions about the integration of this equation and the use of exponential functions to express the solution. Some participants question the assumptions made regarding friction and the correctness of the equations presented.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the correct form of the equations involved, with some participants providing guidance on the use of complex numbers in the solutions. Multiple interpretations of the equations are being discussed, and there is a recognition of potential typos in the source material being referenced.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may impose specific conditions or initial values that need to be considered in their solutions. The exact wording of the problem is also being scrutinized for accuracy.

stunner5000pt
Messages
1,447
Reaction score
5
Ok the system which is doing the oscillations is described here

http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/SpringsTwoSpringsandaMass.html

however, that differential equation over there gives the equation of motion. What i need is the differential equation for the position of the mass

ALso given to me is the length of the left spring L1 and the right spring L2. Find th equation of motion

[tex]m \frac{d^2 y}{dt^2} = -b\frac{dy}{dt}-(k_{1}+k_{2})y[/tex]

now if this the equatio of moti0n then the equation of posotion would be given by the integral of this??
so then i sub v = dy/dt and solve?? and assume a new function like [tex]e^{\lambda t}[/tex] for the function y??
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The system described on the Wolfram page assumes no friction. The equation of motion you wrote has a friction term in it. Please copy/paste the question exactly how it is asked.
 
Let k1 be the spring constant for the left spring L1 be its length
Let k2 be the psirng constant for the right spring L2 be its length
Let m be the mass
Let b the damping coefficient
Write a second order differential equation for the position at time t
Thats how the question is worded
Refer to the wolfram page for the diagram only
 
dextercioby said:
Yes,then everything is okay. :smile:

Daniel.
what do you mean?
 
let [itex]y=Ae^{\lambda t}[/itex]
just want to remind you lambda and A are not real

the real part of y is your solution...
if you don't want to deal with complex number...you can try [itex]Ae^{at}sinbt+Be^{at}cosbt[/itex]
 
ok i cna solve it but for the lambda i'd get for [tex]y = Ae^{\lambda t}[/tex]

[tex]\lambda = = \frac{-Ab \pm \sqrt{A^2 b^2 -4Am(k_{1}+k_{2})}}{2Am}[/tex]
ok so i got the lambda nad all i solved the bloody thing

but how does the lambda relate to the length of the springs and stuff??
because the book gives an answer
[tex]m \frac{d^2 y}{dt^2} + b \frac{dy}{dt} + (k_{1}+k_{2})y = k_{1}L_{1} - k_{2} L_{2}+k_{2}[/tex]

how'd they get that?
 
The last equation u posted is incorrect.You may want to post the correct one.

Daniel.
 
which one is wrong?

this one?? I ttyped it straight out from the textbook [tex]m \frac{d^2 y}{dt^2} + b \frac{dy}{dt} + (k_{1}+k_{2})y = k_{1}L_{1} - k_{2} L_{2}+k_{2}[/tex]

or the other one in the last post
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Yes,that one.Do you see why it's wrong...?

Daniel.
 
  • #11
fidning the value of lambda fives me the function y and y is the function of position correct?

Is ther any initial condition i have to asume in thsi situation ??
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Your lambda is wrong (just a minor mistake, almost right)... try it again.
if your lambda are distinct you will have 2 solution:
[tex]y_1 = A_+e^{\lambda_+ t}[/tex]
[tex]y_2 = A_-e^{\lambda_- t}[/tex]
are your answer...
and any linear combination of y1 and y2 is your answer,too... therefore, the general form of your solution is:
[tex]y = A_1 y_1 + A_2 y_2[/tex]

edit: y,A,lambda are complex number... for this type of question, complex number is a little bit easier to work with...

if you want a real solution, use [itex]e^{ix} = cosx+isinx[/itex] and a real initial condition substitude into y, since you have 2 unknown in y, you need 2 equation for the initial condition: ie. y(0)=y_0, y'(0)=y'_0...
 
Last edited:
  • #13
I was contesting the equation you posted and said to have copied from the book.Maybe it was a typo in the book.

Daniel.
 

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K