How Does Work Affect the Energy of a System?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between work and the energy of a system, particularly focusing on whether work can change the energy of a system and the distinctions between conservative and nonconservative forces.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Exploratory

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definitions of work and its effects on potential and kinetic energy, questioning the implications of conservative versus nonconservative forces. Some participants attempt to clarify the conditions under which work affects energy, while others seek to understand specific scenarios involving friction and inclined planes.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants raising questions about the nature of work and energy changes in different contexts. Some guidance has been offered regarding the distinction between internal and external work, and the implications of nonconservative forces have been introduced as a point of exploration.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating concepts that may have been previously introduced in class or textbooks, and there is an emphasis on understanding the definitions and implications of different types of forces in relation to work and energy.

hotmail590
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Can work change the energy of a system?

Work cannot change the energy of a system.

The above is false but i am not sure how to explain it
Can someone please help me out?

I understand that work = negative potential energy
W = -U

Also work = Change of Kinetic Energy
W = (triangle)K
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Can anyone help me out?
 
hotmail590 said:
I understand that work = negative potential energy
W = -U

Also work = Change of Kinetic Energy
W = (triangle)K

Not in general. In general, work is given by:

[tex] W=\int_C\vec{F} \cdot d \vec{s}[/tex]

Not all forces have a corresponding potential energy function. Such forces are called nonconservative. This term should have been presented to you either in class or in your textbook. An example of a nonconservative force is friction[/color].

That is a lead for you to follow. Try to think about that in the context of your question.
 
Does that mean that if there is work, then the energy system is nonconservative and if there is no work then the energy system is conservative?
 
No. Both conservative forces and nonconservative forces can do work.
 
Last edited:
Let's put it this way. Take your system to be an inclined plane of height H and a block of mass M. Let the surface of contact between the block and the plane have a coefficient of kinetic friction [itex]\mu_K[/itex]. Now let the block slide down the plane from rest.

Question: Will the block's KE at the bottom equal its PE at the top? If not, then where did the missing energy go? What force was responsible for the loss?

This should be easy to answer.
 
Also, the distinction should be made between INTERNAL work (that performed by forces derived soley from elements internal to the system) and EXTERNAL work (which is derived from forces external to the system).

INTERNAL work does NOT change total system energy. Only EXTERNAL work can change total system energy. Thus, the system under consideration (and what it contains and does not contain) must be defined prior to determining the effect of a given force's work on total system energy.



~~
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K