Getting started with differential equations

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around differential equations, specifically focusing on the equation \(\frac{dp}{dt}=0.5p-450\) and its manipulation. Participants are exploring the transition between different forms of the equation and the application of the chain rule in the context of logarithmic differentiation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to understand the relationship between the equations presented, particularly how to derive the logarithmic form from the differential equation. Questions about the application of the chain rule and its implications in the context of the problem are raised.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and clarifications regarding the chain rule and its application. Some participants express confusion about specific steps, while others offer explanations and corrections. There is no explicit consensus on the understanding of the transition between the equations, but productive dialogue is ongoing.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention typos in their previous posts, indicating a need for clarity in the mathematical expressions being discussed. The original poster expresses difficulty with the chain rule, which is a key concept in the problem at hand.

DivGradCurl
Messages
364
Reaction score
0
Folks, I'm just getting started with differential equations and I need some help.

[tex]\frac{dp}{dt}=0.5p-450 \qquad (1)[/tex]

[tex]\frac{dp/dt}{p-900}=\frac{1}{2} \qquad \mbox{if }p \neq 900 \qquad (2)[/tex]

[tex]\frac{d}{dt}\ln \left| p-900 \right| = \frac{1}{2} \qquad (3)[/tex]

I'm stuck in [tex](3)[/tex]. I know

[tex]\frac{d}{dt}\ln \left| x \right| = \frac{1}{x}[/tex]

but I still don't understand how that is obtained.

Any help is highly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean?
[tex]\frac{d}{dt}ln|x(t)|=\frac{dx}{dt}\frac{1}{x}[/tex]
 
I've just edited my previous post. There was a typo.

Well, the fact that in general

[tex]\frac{d}{dt}\ln \left| x \right| = \frac{1}{x}[/tex]

should give some insight into the transition from (2) to (3), but I still don't get it. That's what I mean.

Thanks
 
Last edited:
thiago_j said:
I've just edited my previous post. There was a typo.

Well, the fact that in general

[tex]\frac{d}{dt}\ln \left| x \right| = \frac{1}{x}[/tex]

should give some insight into the transition from (2) to (3), but I still don't get it. That's what I mean.

Thanks
First off, this is WRONG!
It should be:
[tex]\frac{d}{dt}\ln \left| x \right| = \frac{1}{x}\frac{dx}{dt}[/tex]

Do you now see the connection between (2) and (3)?
 
Ooops. I'm sorry (it was a typo). I mean

[tex]\frac{d}{dx}\ln \left| x \right|=\frac{1}{x}[/tex]

I still don't get the connection between (2) and (3). Could you please clarify that?
 
Note that, by the chain rule we have :
[tex]\frac{d}{dt}ln|p(t)-900|=\frac{1}{p-900}\frac{dp}{dt}=\frac{\frac{dp}{dt}}{p-900}[/tex]
Does that help you?
 
Have you been taught the METHOD OF SEPARATION OF VARIABLES...?I.e.Working with differentials,just as if they were numbers which could be multiplied & divided with...?

Daniel.
 
So, my problem is with the chain rule step. Arildno, I don't see why

[tex]\frac{d}{dt}ln|p(t)-900|=\frac{1}{p-900}\frac{dp}{dt}[/tex]

although I can apply it (for example):

[tex]\frac{d}{dx}2(4x+1)^2=2\cdot 2 \cdot (4x+1)\cdot 4=64x+16[/tex]

Could please you explain me how that works?

Daniel, I've read about separation of variables. That's going to be useful once I'm done with (3) and move on.
 
Well, the chain rule states, letting x=p-900:
[tex]\frac{d}{dt}ln|p-900|=\frac{d}{dt}ln|x|=(\frac{d}{dx}ln|x|)\frac{dx}{dp}\frac{dp}{dt},\frac{d}{dx}ln|x|=\frac{1}{x},\frac{dx}{dp}=1[/tex]

were you interested in a more detailed explanation behind the chain rule?
 
  • #10
What is [tex]\frac{d\ln u(t)}{dt}[/tex]...?You said u knew how to apply the chain rule...


Daniel.
 
  • #11
I can now see the way to get there:

[tex]\frac{dp}{dt}=0.5p-450 \qquad (1)[/tex]

[tex]\frac{dp/dt}{p-900}=\frac{1}{2} \qquad \mbox{if }p \neq 900 \qquad (2)[/tex]

[tex]\frac{dp}{dt} \left[ \frac{1}{p-900}\right] =\frac{1}{2}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{dp}{dt} \left[ \frac{d}{dp} \ln \left| p-900 \right| \right] =\frac{1}{2}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{d}{dt}\ln \left| p-900 \right| = \frac{1}{2} \qquad (3)[/tex]

Thank you
 
  • #12
Okay,how about posting the sollution to this ODE...?

Daniel.
 
  • #13
[tex]\frac{dp}{dt}=0.5p-450[/tex]

[tex]\frac{dp/dt}{p-900}=\frac{1}{2} \qquad \mbox{if }p \neq 900[/tex]

[tex]\frac{dp}{dt} \left[ \frac{1}{p-900}\right] =\frac{1}{2}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{dp}{dt} \left[ \frac{d}{dp} \ln \left| p-900 \right| \right] =\frac{1}{2}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{d}{dt}\ln \left| p-900 \right| = \frac{1}{2}[/tex]

[tex]\int \left[ \frac{d}{dt}\ln \left| p-900 \right| \right] dt = \int \frac{1}{2} dt[/tex]

[tex]\ln \left| p-900 \right| = \frac{t}{2} + \mathrm{C}[/tex]

[tex]\left| p-900 \right| = e^{\frac{t}{2} + \mathrm{C}}[/tex]

[tex]\left| p-900 \right| = e^{\mathrm{C}}e^{\frac{t}{2}}[/tex]

[tex]p-900 = \pm e^{\mathrm{C}}e^{\frac{t}{2}}[/tex]

[tex]p(t) = 900 + \mathrm{K}e^{\frac{t}{2}} \quad \mbox{where } \mathrm{K}=\pm e^{\mathrm{C}} \mbox{ is an arbitrary constant.}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #14
That is correct.
 
  • #15
Look at the bright side.Once u'll learn separation of variables,u'll be able to shortcut many calculations...:wink:

Daniel.
 
  • #16
Yes, indeed. :-p

[tex]\frac{dp}{dt}=0.5p-450[/tex]

[tex]\frac{dp/dt}{p-900}=\frac{1}{2} \qquad \mbox{if }p \neq 900[/tex]

[tex]\int \frac{dp}{p-900}=\int \frac{dt}{2}[/tex]

[tex]\ln \left| p-900 \right| = \frac{t}{2} + \mathrm{C}[/tex]

[tex]\left| p-900 \right| = e^{\frac{t}{2} + \mathrm{C}}[/tex]

[tex]\left| p-900 \right| = e^{\mathrm{C}}e^{\frac{t}{2}}[/tex]

[tex]p-900 = \pm e^{\mathrm{C}}e^{\frac{t}{2}}[/tex]

[tex]p(t) = 900 + \mathrm{K}e^{\frac{t}{2}} \quad \mbox{where } \mathrm{K}=\pm e^{\mathrm{C}} \mbox{ is an arbitrary constant.}[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K