Quick question about a telescoping series

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the telescoping series defined as \(\sum_{j=k}^{\infty}\left\{{\frac{1}{b_{j}}-\frac{1}{b_{j+1}}}\right\}=\frac{1}{b_{k}}\), which holds for all real monotone sequences \(b_j\). The partial sum is expressed as \(S_n=\frac{1}{b_k}-\frac{1}{b_{k+(n+1)}}\), leading to the conclusion that as \(n\) approaches infinity, \(b_{k+(n+1)}\) must approach zero. The key finding is that \(b_j\) must be strictly increasing for the identity to hold, regardless of the specific values in the sequence. The discussion also clarifies that the series does not need to be restricted to monotone or real sequences.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of telescoping series
  • Familiarity with limits in calculus
  • Knowledge of monotone sequences
  • Basic algebraic manipulation of series
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of telescoping series in detail
  • Explore the concept of monotone sequences and their implications
  • Learn about convergence and limits in series
  • Investigate the generalization of series beyond monotone or real sequences
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying calculus or real analysis, and anyone interested in series convergence and properties of sequences.

Townsend
Messages
240
Reaction score
0
[tex]\sum_{j=k}^{\infty}\left\{{\frac{1}{b_{j}}-\frac{1}{b_{j+1}}}\right\}=\frac{1}{b_{k}}[/tex]

This series holds for all real monotone sequences of [tex]b_j[/tex].

So if I were to carry this series out to say n I end up with a partial sum that looks like:

[tex]S_n=\frac{1}{b_k}-\frac{1}{b_{k+(n+1)}}[/tex]

Now as n goes to infinity we are left with just [tex]b_k[/tex]. This of course implies that [tex]\frac{1}{b_{k+(n+1)}}[/tex] goes to zero as n goes to infinity. So does this mean that the monotone sequence [tex]b_j[/tex] must equal {1,2,3,4,5,...,j} ? If not what exactly are the constraints on [tex]b_j[/tex] to make that series an identity?

Thanks for the help everyone.

JTB
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Never mind...I figured it out. As long as [tex]b_j[/tex] is strictly increasing then the identity holds. The amount of jump between any two terms is irrelevant.

If there are any further comments please feel free to make them other wise I will let this thread die peacefully.

JTB
 
Townsend said:
[tex]\sum_{j=k}^{\infty}\left\{{\frac{1}{b_{j}}-\frac{1}{b_{j+1}}}\right\}=\frac{1}{b_{k}}[/tex]

This series holds for all real monotone sequences of [tex]b_j[/tex].

Actually, it's a bit cleaner to talk about it as:
[tex]\sum_{i=k}^{\infty} \left(a_i-a_{i+1}\right)[/tex]
Then any partial sum can easily be evaluated:
[tex]\sum_{i=k}^{n} \left(a_i-a_{i+1}\right) = a_k-a_{n+1}[/tex]
so we have
[tex]\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \sum_{i=k}^{n} \left(a_i-a_{i+1}\right) = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} a_k-a_{n+1}=a_k - \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} a_{n+1}[/tex]

There's no need to restrict the series to being monotone or real.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K