Finding the Degree of \sqrt{3} + \sqrt[3]{4} Over Q: A Polynomial Search

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter T-O7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Degree
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the degree over Q of the number \(\sqrt{3} + \sqrt[3]{4}\). Participants explore various methods to derive a polynomial that this expression satisfies, including algebraic manipulations and vector space considerations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks how to find the degree of \(\sqrt{3} + \sqrt[3]{4}\) and expresses difficulty in finding a polynomial that it satisfies.
  • Another participant suggests expressing the number as a polynomial equation and provides a series of transformations leading to a polynomial, though they express uncertainty about their steps.
  • A different approach is proposed, where participants suggest raising the number to powers to find a linearly dependent set, using examples from similar expressions.
  • One participant infers that reaching a fifth power indicates a degree of 4, while another argues that the degree must be 6 based on the algebraic order of the components involved.
  • Concerns are raised about the complexity of manipulating radicals and how they might complicate the derivation of a polynomial.
  • A participant shares their polynomial derived from Zurtex's method and questions how to determine the algebraic order without extensive calculations.
  • Another participant explains that the degrees of the individual components suggest the overall degree must be 6, but acknowledges that further proof is needed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the degree of the number, with some suggesting it is 4 and others arguing for 6. There is no consensus on the correct degree or the best method to derive the polynomial.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of manipulating radicals and the potential for errors in calculations, indicating that assumptions about the irreducibility of derived polynomials may depend on further verification.

T-O7
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Does anyone know how to find the degree over Q of this number:
[tex]\sqrt{3} + \sqrt[3]{4}[/tex]

In fact I'm having trouble finding any generic polynomial that this satisfies! Please help :biggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know what the question is that you're asking so I'm probably being really stupid here, but I assume it would help if you had that expressed as the rote of some polynomial equation with integer coefficients:

[tex]x = \sqrt{3} + \sqrt[3]{4}[/tex]

[tex]x - \sqrt{3} = \sqrt[3]{4}[/tex]

[tex]x^3 - 3\sqrt{3}x^2 + 9x - 3\sqrt{3} = 4[/tex]

[tex]x^3 + 9x - 4 = 3\sqrt{3}x^2 + 3\sqrt{3}[/tex]

[tex]x^6 + 6x^4 - 8x^3 + 81x^2 - 72x - 16 = 27x^4 + 54x^2 + 27[/tex]

[tex]x^6 - 21x^4 - 8x^3 + 27x^2 - 72x - 43 = 0[/tex]

That help at all? (still probably worth checking my steps haha)
 
Last edited:
Or, if you'd like to do it a different way, just keep raising your number to powers until you get a linearly dependent set. (Treating each distinct irrational number as a basis vector)

For example, for a = √2 + √3:

a^0 = 1
a^1 = √2 + √3
a^2 = 5 + 2 √6
a^3 = 11 √2 + 9 √3
a^4 = 49 + 20 √6

So, Q(a) is a vector space over Q, with basis vectors 1, √2, √3, and √6. We have 5 different vectors, so 1, a, a^2, a^3, and a^4 form a linearly dependent set...
 
Of course, the fact that you have to go to 5th power to get a dependent set means that the degree is 4?

(And notice that Hurkyl was using [itex]\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{3}[/itex], NOT the number of the original question. I like Zurtex's method: [itex]\sqrt{2}+ ^3\sqrt{3}[/itex] is algebraic of order 6 and so must have degree 6 over Q.
 
Zurtex's approach is certainly easier to execute, but sometimes it's nonobvious how to manipulate things so that radicals don't proliferate. For example, if the cube roots of both 2 and 4 are in the number, when you cube to get rid of the cube root of 2, the cube root of 4 will just introduce more cube roots of 2.
 
Great, thanks a lot guys!
Following Zurtex's method, i calculated:
[tex]x^6-9x^4-8x^3+27x^2-72x-11=0[/tex] for [tex]x=\sqrt{3}+\sqrt[3]{4}[/tex].
(There was a little error with zurtex's calculation i think)
I managed to prove that this was irreducible tediously...but (this might be a dumb question) how did you know x was algebraic of order 6 to begin with? That would save me a lot of trouble heh
 
Because [itex][\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{3}) : \mathbb{Q}] = 2[/itex] and [itex][\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[3]{4}}) : \mathbb{Q}] = 3[/itex]. Therefore, both 2 and 3 must divide [itex][\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{3}, \sqrt[3]{4}}) : \mathbb{Q}][/itex].

This strongly suggests that the degree of your number must be 6... but more work would be needed to prove it.

Oh, and a bit of shamelessness. :smile: If you used my approach to come up with a polynomial your number satisfies, you can also use it directly to prove that it is the minimum polynomial.

For example, for √2 + √3, I just have to prove that {1, a, a^2, a^3} is linearly independent, which is a fairly straightforward task.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K