Implicit differentiation and a bicorn curve

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around implicit differentiation related to the bicorn curve defined by the equation (x^2+8y-16)^2=y^2(16-x^2). The original poster seeks to verify that the tangent lines at the points (0,4) and (0,4/3) are horizontal.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster describes two methods for finding the derivative: one by expanding the equation and the other by applying the chain and product rules without expansion. They express uncertainty about how to verify the horizontal tangents at the specified points.
  • Some participants emphasize the need to evaluate the derivative at the specific points to determine the slope, while questioning the original poster's reasoning about solving for the points.
  • Others suggest that simply substituting the points into the derivative expression is the correct approach to confirm the slope is zero.
  • There are discussions about the implications of the derivative being zero and the relationship between the function values and the derivative.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing guidance on evaluating the derivative at the given points. There is a recognition of conceptual misunderstandings, and some clarification has been offered regarding the relationship between the derivative and the function values.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original equation does not provide an explicit function for y(x), which complicates direct substitutions. There are also references to potential conceptual misunderstandings regarding the implications of a zero derivative.

erik05
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Hey all. There's a question I seem to be stuck on involving implict differentiation. Here it is:

The curve called a bicorn has the equation [tex](x^2+8y-16)^2=y^2(16-x^2)[/tex] Verify by implicit differentiation that its tangent lines at the points [tex](0,4)[/tex] and [tex](0,\frac{4}{3})[/tex] are horizontal. Do by: a) expanding the equation
b) not expanding the equation


a) I expanded out the equation to get [tex]x^4+ x^2y^2 + 16x^2y-32x^2+48y^2-256y+256[/tex] and took the derivative of all the terms and got the answer [tex]y'= \frac {-4x^3-2xy^2-32xy+64x}{2x^2y+16x^2+96y-256}[/tex]

b) Not expanding the equation and using the chain rule and product rule for each side respectively and then taking the derivative, I also got [tex]y'= \frac {-4x^3-2xy^2-32xy+64x}{2x^2y+16x^2+96y-256}[/tex]

My question is now,how would you solve the above derivative to get the points [tex](0,4)[/tex] and [tex](0,\frac {4}{3} )[/tex] to verify it? Or would you just put in those two points in the derivative and assuming that I did it right, get the slope of 0? I'm pretty sure that the better way to do this is to solve for those two points since you could just put those points in the original equation [tex](x^2+8y-16)^2=y^2(16-x^2)[/tex] to get zero but correct me if I'm wrong. So,any suggestions? Thank you for the help in advance.

P.S- Not that it really matters but here is a picture of a bicorn:
http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/~pbourke/curves/bicorn/1.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to compute the slope at those specific points ,which means that u have to eveluate the derivative at those points ...

Daniel.

P.S.BTW,this fact is trivial.
 
So basically what I was doing was wrong?
 
erik05 said:
My question is now, how would you solve the above derivative to get the points [tex](0,4)[/tex] and [tex](0,\frac {4}{3} )[/tex] to verify it?
^ doesn't make any sense. Why do you seem to think that you will somehow "get those points" out of that expression?


erik05 said:
Or would you just put in those two points in the derivative and assuming that I did it right, get the slope of 0?
Exactly. That is the correct method. THINK about why for a minute. What information have you been given? That the slope of a tangent line to the curve at each of the points (0,4) and (0, 4/3) is zero. That means that the derivative of the function is zero at those points i.e. the function y'(x) has a value of of 0 when x = 0 and y = 4, and also when x = 0 and y = 4/3. Substitute those x and y values into your expression for the derivative in order to compute the value of the derivative at that point.


erik05 said:
I'm pretty sure that the better way to do this is to solve for those two points
Sorry, like I said, this makes no sense.


erik05 said:
since you could just put those points in the original equation [tex](x^2+8y-16)^2=y^2(16-x^2)[/tex] to get zero
What makes you say that? EDIT: that expression is not even an explicit expression for the function y(x), so plugging those two numbers in will give you nothing useful at all. You'll just get:

something = something (which is correct, but not useful)

And even if you had an explicit expression for y(x), you shouldn't expect to get zero when you plug in x = 0. You should expect to get y = 4 and y = 4/3 as solutions. :rolleyes: Just because the value of the derivative of a function at a point is zero doesn't mean that the value of the function itself must be zero (in general...it could be in specific situation, eg for the function y = x^2, but there is no reason is has to be). The only restriction that the condition that y'(a) must be zero (at some point a) imposes is that the value of the function y(a) at that point must be an extremum. I hope that these corrections help. You seem to have some conceptual hang ups. I haven't checked your math over though...
 
Last edited:
Thanks cepheid for the explanation, it really helped clarify a few things and I hope my math is right.

cepheid said:
You seem to have some conceptual hang ups.

Yes,I should really work on that...
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K