Claculate the final speed of a skier who skis down a hill

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the final speed of a skier descending an 80-meter-high hill with negligible friction, considering two scenarios: one with an initial speed of zero and another with an initial speed of 3.0 m/sec. The context involves concepts from energy conservation and kinematics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of kinematic equations and energy conservation principles. Some explore the relationship between potential and kinetic energy, while others question the adequacy of information provided for solving the problem. There is also a focus on the implications of mass in the calculations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, sharing different approaches and clarifying concepts. Some guidance has been provided regarding the use of energy conservation, but multiple interpretations and methods are still being explored without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

There are questions about the definitions of height and distance in the context of the problem, as well as the implications of mass in the energy equations. The original poster's confusion about the initial conditions and the relevance of potential energy is also noted.

lochs
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I have an assignment question, it states: Surprisingly little advantage is gained by getting a running start in a downhill race. To demonstrate this, claculate the final speed of a skier who skis down a hill 80-m-high with negligible friction (a) if her initial speed is zero; (b) if her initial speed is 3.0 m/sec. [this final speed found in part (b) is larger than in part (a), but by far less than 3.0 m/sec!]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use this kinematic equation:

[tex]v_{f}^2 = v_{i}^2 + 2ad[/tex]

Compare the two.
 
lochs said:
I have an assignment question, it states: Surprisingly little advantage is gained by getting a running start in a downhill race. To demonstrate this, claculate the final speed of a skier who skis down a hill 80-m-high with negligible friction (a) if her initial speed is zero; (b) if her initial speed is 3.0 m/sec. [this final speed found in part (b) is larger than in part (a), but by far less than 3.0 m/sec!]
For both cases:
{Delta Kinetic Energy} = -{Delta Potential Energy} = mgh = (9.81)(80)*m = (785)*m =
= m*(vf)2/2 - m*(vi)2/2 =
= (m/2)*{(vf)2 - (vi)2}
::: ⇒ (vf)2 - (vi)2 = (1570)
::: ⇒ vf = sqrt{1570 + (vi)2}

Case #1:
vi = 0 ::: ⇒ vf = sqrt{1570 + (0)2} = (39.6 m/sec)

Case #2:
vi = (3.0 m/sec) ::: ⇒ vf = sqrt{1570 + (3)2} = (39.7 m/sec)


~~
 
Last edited:
Thank you
xanthym, your response is a little confusing.. is that potential energy that you're using?

Jameson, i don't get how i'd get a? also would distance be 80 m? and if so isn't that height or are they the same thing?
 
xanthym's right. I just glanced at this question... you don't have enough information to use a kinematic equation.

You know the potential energy at the top, and since their is no kinetic energy yet, you can call this total the total energy.

[tex]P.E. = mgh[/tex]
[tex]= (m)(9.81)(80)[/tex]

It is interesting to note that her mass does not affect this problem, as it will cancel out because it is used in every term.

Look at xanthym's work, and see how using the Law of Conservation of Energy will help you figure out the final velocities.

--------
Jameson
 
Ok so then
its PE=gh since mass cancels out?

this is what i have

KEi=PEi =KEf + PEf
becomes 0 + mgh inital = 1/2mv final squared + 0

v final=mgh inital = 2gh initial

v final= (2gh inital) 1/2

sorry i hope that makes sense.. I'm not sure how to use the latex thing..
 
[tex](2gh + v_i^2)^\frac{1}{2}[/tex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
okay i got it =)

thank you so much!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
39
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
12K