Why Does a Charged Disk Generate a Non-Zero Electric Field at Its Center?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hell-hawk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electromagnetism
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion addresses the electric field generated at the center of a charged disk, specifically at point O. Despite the mathematical conclusion that the electric field (E) at O is non-zero, the initial reasoning suggests that the contributions from diametrically opposite charge elements on the disk should cancel out, leading to a zero field. The flaw in this reasoning is clarified by recognizing that the disk can be conceptualized as an assembly of infinitesimal rings, where the innermost ring behaves like a point charge, thus contributing to a non-zero electric field at O.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and charge distributions
  • Familiarity with the concept of superposition in electrostatics
  • Knowledge of mathematical integration techniques for continuous charge distributions
  • Basic principles of point charges and their electric fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the electric field due to a charged disk using calculus
  • Explore the concept of electric field lines and their implications in electrostatics
  • Learn about the superposition principle in electrostatics and its applications
  • Investigate the behavior of electric fields around point charges and their interactions
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism, educators teaching electrostatics, and researchers exploring charge distributions and electric fields.

hell-hawk
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have two questions.
The first concerns a charged disk. Consider the center of the surface of the charged disk, O. Mathematically, the value of E at O comes out to be a non-zero finite value. However i am having difficulty linking this with the physical sense. The disk can be thought to be composed of an infinite number of rings; i think that each ring will set up zero electric field at O since for each charge element on the ring, the diametrically opposite charge element of the charge element cancels its effect. So how come does E come out to be non-zero at O? Please explain the flaw in my reasoning in physical terms, not mathematical.
The second question involves two charges. Consider one charge to be fixed, while the other moves past it in a straight line. What fields will be set up?
What force, if any, will act on each of the charges?
Please help. I'll be highly grateful.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hell-hawk said:
I have two questions.
The first concerns a charged disk. Consider the center of the surface of the charged disk, O. Mathematically, the value of E at O comes out to be a non-zero finite value. However i am having difficulty linking this with the physical sense. The disk can be thought to be composed of an infinite number of rings; i think that each ring will set up zero electric field at O since for each charge element on the ring, the diametrically opposite charge element of the charge element cancels its effect. So how come does E come out to be non-zero at O? Please explain the flaw in my reasoning in physical terms, not mathematical.

What if I put a point charge at O? Do you still expect to measure a non-zero E-field there? If you do, then no matter how many of these rings you add, even if the fields for these rings cancel, you will have a net field from this point charge at O. So you should think of a disk as being assembled by all of these rings, except that the ring of infinitesimal diameter at the origin approaches that of a point charge.

Zz.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
799
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
917
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
10K