Solving Kepler's 3rd Law with 4π²/G

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around demonstrating Kepler's 3rd Law using the equation 4π²/G, with a focus on unit conversions involving years, astronomical units (AU), and solar masses. Participants are exploring the implications of these conversions on the law's formulation.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to manipulate the equation to show the relationship between the constants and Kepler's 3rd Law. Some are questioning the correctness of their calculations and unit conversions, while others are exploring how to express the law in a unitless form.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing dialogue about the accuracy of calculations and the implications of unit conversions. Some participants have made progress in aligning their results, while others are still grappling with the conceptual aspects of unit consistency in the context of Kepler's 3rd Law.

Contextual Notes

Participants are discussing the necessity of maintaining unit conversions throughout their calculations, as well as the potential ambiguity in the second part of the question regarding the reduction of Kepler's law to a specific form. There is mention of imposed homework rules that may influence how the problem is approached.

tony873004
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,753
Reaction score
143
Show that
[tex]4\pi^{2}/G = 1yr^{2} M_{Sun}/AU^{3}[/tex]
and that therefore Kepler's 3rd Law reduces to
[tex]P^{2}=a^{3}/(m_{1}+m_{2})[/tex]
if the period P is expressed in years, the semimajor axis a is expressed in AU, and the sum of the masses is expressed in solar masses.

[tex]G = 6.672*10^{-11}Nm^{2}/kg^{2}[/tex]
[tex]N = kg m/s^{2}[/tex]
[tex]1 year = 3.15581*10^{7}seconds[/tex]
[tex]1 AU = 1.49598*10^{11}meters[/tex]
[tex]1 Solar mass = 1.9891*10^{30}kg[/tex]


[tex]\frac{4\pi^{2}}{6.672*10^{-11} \frac{N m^{2}}{kg^{2}}}=\frac {3.15581*10^{7}s^{2}*1.9891*10^{30}kg}{1.49598*10^{11}m^{3}}[/tex]


Substitute [tex]kg m/s^{2} for N[/tex]

[tex]\frac{4\pi^{2}}{6.672*10^{-11} \frac{kg\frac{m}{s^{2}} m^{2}}{kg^{2}}}=\frac {3.15581*10^{7}s^{2}*1.9891*10^{30}kg}{1.49598*10^{11}m^{3}}[/tex]

in the left side of the equation, cancel kg's and combine m's

[tex]\frac{4\pi^{2}}{6.672*10^{-11} \frac{\frac{m^{3}}{s^{2}}}{kg}}=\frac {3.15581*10^{7}s^{2}*1.9891*10^{30}kg}{1.49598*10^{11}m^{3}}[/tex]

re-write the equation

[tex]{4\pi^{2} * 1.49598*10^{11}m^{3} = 6.672*10^{-11} \frac{\frac{m^{3}}{s^{2}}}{kg} * 3.15581*10^{7}s^{2}*1.9891*10^{30}kg[/tex]

The m^3 on the right cancels with the m^3 on the left
the s^2's in the left side of the equation cancel with each other since one is in the denomanator of a fraction, and the other one isn't.
The kg's in the left side of the equation cancel with each other since one is in the denomanator of a fraction, and the other one isn't.

[tex]{4\pi^{2} * 1.49598*10^{11} = 6.672*10^{-11} * 3.15581*10^{7}*1.9891*10^{30}[/tex]

and when I compute this I get:

[tex]591702901743.965 = 4.1881622988912*10^{27}[/tex]
and that's just not right! Where did I go wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
[tex]1 \mbox{year} = 3.15581 \cdot 10^7 \mbox{s} \Longrightarrow (1 \mbox{year})^2 = (3.15581 \cdot 10^7 \mbox{s})^2 \neq 3.15581 \cdot 10^7 \mbox{s}^2[/tex]

similarly for [tex]\mbox{AU}^3[/tex].
 
:smile: Thanks, Data. That's the 2nd time you've bailed me out in the last 2 days.

I also made a small error in G. Should be [tex]6.673*10^{-11}[/tex], not [tex]6.672*10^{-11}[/tex]

So this should change my final line before computing the numbers to:

[tex]{4\pi^{2} * 1.49598*10^{33} = 6.673*10^{-11} * 3.15581*10^{14}*1.9891*10^{30}[/tex]

which gives me
[tex]5.90589231677665*10^{34} = 4.1887900210583*10^{34}[/tex]

They're not too different. At least they're in the same magnitude instead of being 16 magnitudes apart. I'm wondering if this is as good as it gets or if I made another error somewhere?

Any idea how to do the 2nd part of this question, how does this cause Kepler's 3rd law to reduce to [tex]P^{2}=a^{3}/(m_{1}+m_{2})[/tex] ?
 
Last edited:
Almost. You forgot to square the 3.15581, and cube the 1.49598!

The second question is a really ambiguous one. In order to get it to that form, you must assume that both sides of the equation are unitless (otherwise, you keep the fraction [tex]\frac{\mbox{yr}^2}{\mbox{AU}^3}[/tex] on the right side of the equality to balance units). This in turn means you just assume the result for P is in years, etc., which is silly. Anyways, Kepler's Third Law is

[tex]P^2 = \frac{a^3}{m_1+m_2}\cdot \frac{4\pi^2}{G}[/tex]

Just substitute in the equality that you proved in the first part, and see how far you can get~
 
Thanks, Data. I squared and cubed those numbers, and now the answers are equal. I got the second part too. I had to make a new value for G, which equaled 4pi^2, they canceled out and I was left the equation I was asked to justify.
 
You set [tex]G = 4 \pi^2[/tex]? With what justification?
 
[tex]G=6.673*10^{-11}N m^{2}/kg^{2}[/tex] , therefore
[tex]G=6.673*10^{-11}kg (m/s^{2}) m^{2}/kg^{2}[/tex]

substitute in the conversions from mks to AU, Solar Masses, Years

0.00000000006673 * ((1 / 1.9891E+30) * (1 / 149598000000#) / (1 / 31558100) ^ 2#) * (1 / 149598000000# ^ 2 / (1 / 1.9891E+30) ^ 2)

and magically the whole thing equals exactly 4pi^2
Sorry, I didn't feel like TEXing it.

By converting all the units in G to AU, Years, and Solar Masses. Now G cancels out with 4pi^2
[tex]P^2 = \frac{a^3}{m_1+m_2}\cdot \frac{4\pi^2}{G}[/tex]

reduces to

[tex]P^{2}=a^{3}/(m_{1}+m_{2})[/tex]

Which is what the question asked me to do.
 
Ok, that's fine. Make sure you leave in the unit conversion term, though (ie. the magnitude equals the magnitude of [tex]4\pi^2[/tex], but there are still units hanging around that [tex]4\pi^2[/tex] does not carry). You really can't simplify it to the form in your question, as there's always a unitary conversion factor lying around. But whatever, I guess they want you to write it that way :)
 
Yeah, those units bugged me too. So I just dropped them all together 2 steps before my final answer. When the teacher talked about this one in class, everyone had a blank stare. But she hinted that this was the way to do it. At least I'll get effort points!

Thanks for all your help, Data!
 
  • #10
I asked in class today. The units do carry down to the 1.0 computed with 4pi^2/G. Then when you replace the 4pi^2/G in the Kepler's law with 1.0&units, the units cancel with the units in the rest of Kepler's law so that P^2 comes out in years.
 
  • #11
I agree, but then the [tex]P, \ a, \ m_1, \ m_2[/tex] in your new equation aren't the same ones in the original equation (the new ones are unitless). Essentially the point is that [tex]\mbox{time} \neq \frac{\mbox{distance}}{\mbox{mass}}[/tex].
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
985
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K