Simple Question about Photodiodes [Current and Voltage]

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Crumbles
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Voltage
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the functionality and application of photodiodes, specifically focusing on the conversion of current output to voltage and the differences between current and voltage sources. Participants explore theoretical and practical aspects of photodiode operation, including its modes of operation and circuit design considerations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that a photodiode produces a current output that must be converted to voltage using a current to voltage op-amp circuit, while others question the necessity of this conversion, suggesting that current inherently implies voltage.
  • It is noted that a photodiode can act as a current source when exposed to light, and a current to voltage amplifier is preferred for ease of handling voltages and simplicity in construction.
  • Participants discuss the differences between current sources and voltage sources, highlighting that connecting either to a circuit results in both voltage and current, but the behavior differs under ideal conditions.
  • Some contributions clarify that an ideal voltage source can theoretically provide infinite current, while an ideal current source can produce infinite voltage, which is not physically possible in real-world applications.
  • One participant explains the operational modes of photodiodes, distinguishing between photovoltaic and photoconductive modes, and how these modes affect the output characteristics when interfaced with circuits.
  • There is a mention of using a resistor to convert between current and voltage signals without the need for an op-amp, although this is contested by others who emphasize the benefits of using an op-amp for accuracy.
  • Several participants share their experiences and insights regarding the practical implementation of photodiodes in sensor circuits, including the importance of minimizing dark current for improved accuracy.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity and methodology of converting current to voltage from photodiodes, with no consensus reached on the best approach or the implications of current versus voltage sources.

Contextual Notes

Some statements reflect assumptions about ideal conditions that may not hold in practical applications, and there are unresolved mathematical and conceptual nuances regarding the behavior of current and voltage sources.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in electronics, sensor design, and the theoretical underpinnings of photodiode operation, particularly in the context of current and voltage signal processing.

Crumbles
Messages
137
Reaction score
0
Would someone be right in saying that a photodiode produces a current as output and that to be able to make use of this current, you ABSOLUTELY need to convert it into a voltage by using a current to voltage op-amp circuit?

I've heard this from someone but to be honest doesn't make much sense to me. I mean if you get a current from the photodiode, surely it means you have a voltage present. In other words, if you have a current, it inherently implies you have a voltage and vice versa. So, I don't understand the need for a 'current to voltage' circuit unless what you want to do is amplify the signal from your photodiode.

So if anyone has any understanding of this 'current to voltage' concept, please enlighten me!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The photo diode can act as a current source and produce a certain amount of current(with in limitations) when it is exposed to a certain intensity of light.

A current to voltage amplifier is used be because:
1. Easier to deal with voltages
2. Simpler to build a current to voltage amplifier then a current to current amplifier.
 
Davorak said:
The photo diode can act as a current source and produce a certain amount of current(with in limitations) when it is exposed to a certain intensity of light.

A current to voltage amplifier is used be because:
1. Easier to deal with voltages
2. Simpler to build a current to voltage amplifier then a current to current amplifier.

Thanks for trying to explain this Davorak. I kinda see what you mean. If I understand correctly, a current source is different to a voltage source. I think this is the bit I am confused about. Let's say you have a current source A and a voltage source V. If you connect A to a circuit, would you not inherently get a voltage across that circuit? And vice versa, if you connect a V across a circuit, would you not inherently get a current through the circuit?

Eventually I think my question boils down to: What is the difference between a voltage source and a current source if when you connect either of them to a circuit, you get both a voltage and a current?
 
Crumbles said:
Eventually I think my question boils down to: What is the difference between a voltage source and a current source if when you connect either of them to a circuit, you get both a voltage and a current?
An Ideal Voltage source can source any amount of current. So if you connect the two leads of an Ideal Voltage source you would get infinity current . This is a physical impossibility of course as so is an voltage source.

An Ideal current source can produce any amount of voltage. So if you connect the two leads of a voltage source with an infinite resistance you would get an infinite voltage. This is also not physically possible.

At the extremes for real voltage or current source the ideal model does not work.

The real voltage source is molded by an ideal voltage source in series with a resistor R.

The real current source is molded by an ideal current source in parallel with a resistor R.

These real models are the simple ones a more complex model would have capacitors and inductors as well.
 
Thanks for making this clear guys! I think it makes sense now. :smile:
 
A "current source" is one whose current is either constant, or varies according to some specific relationship. A "voltage source" is one whose voltage is either constant, or varies according to some specific relationship. The other value is assumed to vary based on the impedance connected to the source.

A "current signal" is a signal in which the information is encoded by the amount of current flowing. A "voltage signal" is a signal in which the information is encoded by the voltage present.

You can convert between current and voltage signals with a simple resistor. There is usually no need for an op-amp.

- Warren
 
Last edited:
Hi guys ! I need to convert the current received of photodiode to a voltage and I need to build sensor circuit .
What device should i use to convert current to voltage ?
Where can I get the complete circuit of Photodiode ?
 
KingNothing said:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/visource.html

And yes, current and voltage are mutually inclusive, but it's different when you think about having no resistance.

Very good summary KingNothing. I've been describing I & V as "mutually inclusive" for the last 7 years on several forums including this one and got flamed for it. I'm glad the mutual inclusion concept is taking hold.

A photodiode, herein called PD, can operate in either mode, photovoltaic PV, or photoconductive, PC. In PV mode, the PD is terminated in an open or very high impedance and exhibits voltage source behavior where the voltage value is proportional to incident light.

In the PC mode, the PD is terminated in a very low impedance. This low Z could actually be the 2 inputs to an op amp (traditional voltage feedback topology) since the servo loop maintains a virtual short. The behavior is that of a current source where the current value is proportional to light intensity. The feedback resistor across the op amp terminals results in a voltage source output. The PD current Ipd, times Rfdbk equals Vout.

Claude
 
  • #10
The basic principle of a phototube is to amplify the signals from photoelectrons leaving the photocathode and hitting the first dynode, and this signal being amplified and hitting the anode. Suppose the amplification is G and there are 1 million photoelectrons per sec. Then the output anode current is 1.6 x 10^-10 G milliamps. The is a current source, and all of the information about the number of photoelectrons is in this current. If you terminate this current in a 50 ohm resistor, the average voltage would be 8 x 10^-12 G volts. If you were integrating the current with a megohm termination, then the voltage would be 1.6 x 10^-7 G volts. I have personally used 14 stage phototubes (RCA 6810) with 10^7 gain so this would then be over a volt. In summary two things 1) all the information is in the output current, not voltage; and 2) the anode is a current source, not a voltage source.
 
  • #11
Hi Can anyone give the correct explanation of " N level of thresholding " ?
There is two mode of photodiode ( Photovoltaic mode , Photoconductive mode ) Which mode must I choose for sensing the amount of environmental light ?
 
  • #12
Vincent90 said:
Hi Can anyone give the correct explanation of " N level of thresholding " ?
There is two mode of photodiode ( Photovoltaic mode , Photoconductive mode ) Which mode must I choose for sensing the amount of environmental light ?

I use the PC mode with the PD placed across the 2 input terminals of an op amp. This is a transresistance amp, and the feedback resistor times the PD current equals the output voltage. By placing the PD at virtual zero volts due to the op amp servoing the 2 inputs to near zero, the dark current is minimized, improving accuracy and dynamic range.

Claude
 
  • #13
Can anyone explain me how to measure N-level thresholding in light sensor ( photodiode ) circuit ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K