How influential is the media in shaping public opinion?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter marcus
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the influence of media in shaping public opinion, particularly in the context of political reporting and perceived biases. Participants explore the implications of media practices, the historical context of media behavior, and the trustworthiness of news sources.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express shock at the perceived blatant biases in media reporting, particularly regarding political figures and events.
  • Others argue that the media's leanings are not new and have been present across different administrations, suggesting a historical continuity in media practices.
  • Concerns are raised about the media's reliance on pre-packaged content and the lack of investigative journalism, with some noting that this trend contributes to a lack of accountability and ethics in reporting.
  • One participant highlights that both sides of the political spectrum have engaged in questionable media practices, questioning the overall trustworthiness of news media.
  • Another participant cites a quote attributed to Mark Twain to illustrate the dual risks of being uninformed or misinformed through media consumption.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the extent of media influence or the trustworthiness of news sources. Multiple competing views are presented regarding the historical context and current practices of media reporting.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of specific examples of media bias and the dependence on subjective interpretations of media influence. The discussion does not resolve the complexities surrounding media ethics and public perception.

Physics news on Phys.org
Arnold just got caught doing the same. Why would any of this shock you?

To me the republican screw job is so obvious that I can only watch while in awe of the foolishness of this country.
 
Ivan Seeking said:
To me the republican screw job is so obvious that I can only watch while in awe of the foolishness of this country.
First this was debated under the Gannon Guffaw thread, then under FOX's let's bomb them back to the stone age thread, and now this information. Not only is the media leaning more to the right, and practicing censorship, it is being paid to do it.

If you're wondering why the country isn't alarmed, studies showed that Americans who supported Bush tended to have education levels of high school or less. If people were aware of it, they might understand the lack of ethics, but I doubt they would understand the deeper aspect of how this erodes democracy.
 
Well, the article is quite a few pages long there, and I've only read about halfway through, but on page 2 or 3, it mentions this began during the Clinton administration, so it seems you don't get to blame Bush entirely for this one, nor use it as evidence of media leaning to the right. If anything, it's evidence of how lazy our news stations have become that they are essentially resorting to plagiarism in showing pre-packaged videos and claiming it as their own work rather than crediting the source. But, this laziness has been pretty obvious for some time. I can go to the Reuters website and read their stories, then listen to the same pre-packaged story being read on every radio and TV channel I listen to that day (or sometimes there's even a day lag in the news getting out). There is absolutely nothing added, no investigative reporting, nothing that even indicates the media stations have gone about confirming sources; the story is read verbatim, and I never hear credit given anymore "this report just in from the Reuters news wire" or however they used to be credited.

I also don't see it as much worse, other than in not giving credit to the original source, than in writing a story based on a press package handed out to the reporters without the reporters doing any further checking of the facts and information in that press package.
 
This has been brought up about forty times on this board alone, and as Moonbear points out, many politicians from both sides are guilty as is just about every news agency out there, regardless of how it leans. The fact that anyone is shocked by this is what shocks me. Has there ever been a time when the news media was truly trustworthy?
 
The media has never been entirely trustworthy because they will put whatever spin they can on a story so that it sells newspapers or increases the number of viewers. Its a dangerous combination.

I believe it was Mark Twain who said "Those who don't read the newspapers are uninformed...Those who do read the papers are misinformed."
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 200 ·
7
Replies
200
Views
20K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
9K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
24K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
5K