What are the tensions connected to a spinning mass in circular motion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter xangel31x
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tension
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving a mass spinning horizontally in a circle, connected by two wires to a vertical pole. Participants are exploring the tensions in the wires and the forces acting on the mass, particularly in the context of circular motion and equilibrium.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the tensions and the weight of the mass, questioning how to account for these forces in the vertical and horizontal directions. There is an exploration of the geometry involved, particularly the angles made by the wires with the vertical pole.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered clarifications on the forces acting on the mass and the need for equilibrium in both vertical and horizontal directions. There is a recognition of the complexity of the problem, with various interpretations of how to apply the principles of physics to find the tensions.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information they can share or the methods they can use. There is an emphasis on clearly stating the problem and the reasoning behind their approaches.

xangel31x
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I am working on a problem where i need to find the 2 tensions connectd to a mass that is spinning horizontally in a circle at a constant speed. i know that the tensions are different...the first has the tension and the weight and the second is just the second tesnion. i am having a hard time getting the first tension...please someone help me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You haven't done any work?
 
Shockwave said:
You haven't done any work?


no i have i found the cent. acc. the radius, the angle and the lower tension
 
Welcome to PF!
First state your problem CLEARLY, not in a muddled manner (it is basically impossible to figure out the particular problem you are struggling with from what you've written).
Secondly, post a few thoughts on how to approach the problem
 
arildno said:
Welcome to PF!
First state your problem CLEARLY, not in a muddled manner (it is basically impossible to figure out the particular problem you are struggling with from what you've written).
Secondly, post a few thoughts on how to approach the problem

ok sorry...i will try again
 
i have a figure that shows 2 wires connected to a single mass. the mass is revolving horizontally in a circle around the vertical pole. at a constant speed. i need to the two tensions. at first i thought they were the same, but they i realized that the top tension has the weight acting on it also. the second tension equals (m*(v^2)/r)/cos(theta)...now for the first tension i have that it equals(m*(v^2)/r)/cos(theta), but i don't know what to do with the y value i have that as t*sin(theta) = m*g.
i hope this is better
 
Allright, just to get this clear:
The vertical pole plus the two wires form a triangle with the mass whirling about the pole as the third vertex?
I asssume the angles the wires make with the pole are equal to each other?
 
I'll assume I'm right.
Now, you need eqilibrium of forces acting upon the mass in the vertical direction, so you must have:
[tex]T_{top}\cos\theta-T_{bottom}\cos\theta-mg=0[/tex]
That is, the ifference between the "top" tension and tension in the lower wire is:
[tex]T_{top}-T_{bottom}=\frac{mg}{\cos\theta}[/tex]
where [tex]\theta[/tex] is the angle between the wire and the pole.
In the horizontal direction, the tensions must provide the centripetal acceleration.
 
Last edited:
yes the angles are equal... the large triangle splits into two smaller triangles with equal everything exp the hyp. with are the tensions. i saw that you used cos(theta) for both the top and the bottom. that is the whole system that you were doing that for right? i mean doesn't the sin(theta) come into play when you are doing the top tension with the weight?
 
  • #10
I was referring to the geometry, rather than the force diagram.

You are very unclear here, are you sure you understand that the basic law you are to use is F=ma for the mass?

It simply doesn't make sense to allocate the "weight" to the "top tension" as you seem to do.
The sum of forces (both the tensions plus the weight) must yield the centripetal acceleration of the mass.
That is the horizontal component of Newton's 2.law, in the vertical component, the sum of forces must be equal to 0, since the mass doesn't move vertically.
 
  • #11
i thought that the weight went with the top triangle and was used when finding the force of the radius line, which is at the side opposite of the hyp. of the triangle?
 
  • #12
Now, I'll post a detailed solution here; try to see if you can follow it:
1). Each wire makes an angle [tex]\theta[/tex] with the vertical pole, and the tensile forces acting upon the mass from them have directions parallell to the wire.
That is the tensile force from the top-most wire can be written as:
[tex]\vec{T}_{top}=T_{top}(\cos\theta\vec{k}-\sin\theta\vec{i}_{r})[/tex]
where [tex]\vec{i}_{r}[/tex] lies in the horizontal plane (think of it, at a given instant, as [tex]\vec{i}[/tex]), and [tex]\vec{k}[/tex] is along the vertical.
[tex]T_{top}[/tex] is magnitude of the tensile force, i.e, the tension.

Similarly, we have for the tensile force in the lower wire:
[tex]\vec{T}_{bottom}=T_{bottom}(-\cos\theta\vec{k}-\sin\theta\vec{i}_{r})[/tex]

2) The weight of the mass is: [tex]\vec{W}=-mg\vec{k}[/tex]
3) The acceleration of the mass is: [tex]\vec{a}=-\frac{v^{2}}{R}\vec{i}_{r}[/tex]
That is, the mass only experiences centripetal acceleration.
4) Hence, Newton's 2.law states:
[tex]\vec{T}_{top}+\vec{T}_{bottom}+\vec{W}=m\vec{a}[/tex]
Can you take it from here on your own?
 
Last edited:
  • #13
yes, i believe i can take it from there. i was on that path for the most part. thanks for your help
 

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
9K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K