Solving the Riddle of the Three-Story Building

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter T@P
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Building Riddle
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a riddle involving a three-story building with 12 people, where the arrangement of people on each floor changes due to a leaking roof. Participants explore how to determine the original distribution of people across the floors based on the conditions provided.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the scenario and asks for the original arrangement of people on each floor after some have moved down due to rain.
  • Another participant questions whether a statement about the movement of people should refer to the third floor instead of the second floor.
  • One participant proposes a solution indicating that there were originally 2, 3, and 7 people on floors 1, 2, and 3 respectively, based on a backward calculation.
  • Another participant outlines their method using a variable to represent the number of people on the bottom floor and derives the original distribution through equations.
  • A later reply expresses agreement with one of the proposed solutions while acknowledging that different methods can lead to the same conclusion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple approaches to solving the riddle, with some disagreement on the interpretation of the scenario and the correctness of the proposed solutions. No consensus is reached on a single method or answer.

Contextual Notes

Participants rely on various assumptions about the movement of people and the conditions of the floors, which may not be fully articulated. The discussion includes different interpretations of the problem's constraints.

T@P
Messages
274
Reaction score
0
there is a three story building, with a total of 12 people in it. it rained. and the roof leaked.

the people from the third floor asked the second floor people if they could go down to the second floor. the second floor people then said they could only acomodate (on the second floor) the same number of people as there are already on it.

it rained more

the people from the second floor (together with the first floor refugees) asked the first floor people of they could go down to the first floor. they did the same thing the second floor people did: the number of people that can go down onto the first floor must be equal to the number of people that are on the first floor already.

if there were an equal number of people on all the floors after the changes, what was the original arrangement?

just for clarification: not everyone moves down a floor. some people have to stay on the higher floors even though its leaking there. also, there is the boring and the amazingly easy way to do the problem. not that its that hard anyway, but there's just an easier way
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
T@P said:
it rained more

the people from the second floor (together with the first floor refugees) asked the first floor people of they could go down to the first floor.


should that be 3rd flr?
 
Answer: 4 people on floor 1 at the end, so move half of them back to floor 2 to undo the move down to floor 1. Then that's 6 people on floor 2 and 2 people on floor 1. Now move half of floor 2 to floor 3 to undo the move down to floor 2. So originally there were 2, 3, and 7 on floors 1, 2, and 3 respectively.[/color]
 
here's what i did: x is the number originally on the bottom floor. At the end, the number on the bottom floor is 2x. the number on the bottom floor at the end must equal the number on the other floors, and the sum of them all equals 12. So, 2x(3) also equals 12. 12=6x. x=2. then solve backwards from there to get that originally 7 were up top, 3 in the middle, and 2 at the bottom.
 
sorry bjr, but i think its right as it is. and you i did it bycicle tree's way, but i guess your way works too gale17

its all about going backwards. 4/2 = 2
2 + 4 = 6
6/2 = 3
4 + 3 = 7

then make sure you did nothing stupid ;)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K