How Do You Calculate Electric Potential at a Point Near a Charged Rod?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential at a point near a uniformly charged plastic rod. The correct formula derived for the electric potential at point P, located at distance d from one end of the rod, is V = kλ(ln(d+L) - ln(d)), where k is Coulomb's constant and λ is the linear charge density. The integration process involves using dq = λdx and integrating from d to d+L. For a second problem with λ = cx, the integration limits change, resulting in V = kcx(ln(d+L/c) - ln(d), emphasizing the importance of correctly setting integration limits.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric potential and Coulomb's law
  • Familiarity with integration techniques in calculus
  • Knowledge of linear charge density concepts
  • Basic principles of electrostatics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric potential for different charge distributions
  • Learn about the application of integration limits in electrostatics problems
  • Explore the concept of electric field and its relation to electric potential
  • Investigate advanced topics such as electric potential due to non-uniform charge distributions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying electrostatics, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding electric potential calculations near charged objects.

Tassadar27
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
There is a plastic rod with a length L and a uniform positive charge lying on the x axis. With V = 0 at infinity find the electric potential at point P on the axis at distance d from one end of the rod. I got an answer but I have no clue if it is right or not. This is what I know:

[tex]dv = \frac{k dq}{x} \ \ \ \ \ \lambda = \frac{q}{x}[/tex]

[tex]dv = \frac{k\lambda dx}{x} \ \ \ \ \ dq = \lambda dx[/tex]

[tex]\int dv = k\lambda \int \frac{dx}{x}[/tex] Upper = d + L Lower = d

[tex]V = k\lambda(ln(d+L) - ln(d))[/tex]

Is there anything I am missing?

The next problem is similar but [tex]\lambda = cx[/tex] where c is some positive constant. If I just substitute in cx then the x cancles leaving dx which gives x afer the integral. The answer contains a ln so I am missing something. Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Seems right to me. For part ii, V = KCL. Answer does not have an ln.
 


Your approach to finding the electric potential at point P is correct. You have correctly used the formula for electric potential, which is V = kq/r, where k is the Coulomb's constant, q is the charge, and r is the distance from the point to the charge. In this case, you have a uniformly charged rod, so you can use the formula for linear charge density, which is λ = q/L, where q is the total charge and L is the length of the rod.

You have correctly identified that the charge element dq = λdx, where dx is an infinitesimal length of the rod. Then, you have integrated over the length of the rod, from d to d+L, to find the total electric potential at point P. Your final answer, V = kλ(ln(d+L) - ln(d)), is correct.

For the next problem, where λ = cx, you are correct that the x cancels out after substituting in cx for λ. However, you need to be careful when integrating, as the limits of integration will be different. In this case, the limits will be from d to d+L/c, since the charge element, dq = λdx, will now be a function of x. After integrating, you will get V = kcx(ln(d+L/c) - ln(d)).

Make sure you always carefully consider the limits of integration when solving problems involving electric potential.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
64
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K