Why Are the Singular Points z=1/n Isolated in the Function f(z)=1/(sin(pi/z))?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The function f(z) = 1/(sin(pi/z)) has singular points at z=0 and z=1/n, where n is an integer. The singular point z=0 is not isolated because any neighborhood around it contains other singular points, specifically 1/n. In contrast, the singular points z=1/n are isolated because it is possible to find neighborhoods around each z=1/n that do not contain any other singular points. This distinction is crucial in understanding the nature of isolated singularities in complex analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex functions and singularities
  • Familiarity with the concept of neighborhoods in topology
  • Knowledge of analytic functions and their properties
  • Basic principles of limits and continuity in complex analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definition and examples of isolated singularities in complex analysis
  • Learn about the classification of singularities: removable, pole, and essential
  • Explore the concept of neighborhoods in topology and their implications in complex functions
  • Investigate the behavior of analytic functions near singular points
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying complex analysis, as well as educators seeking to clarify the concept of isolated singularities in functions.

PowerClean
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
This one is pretty involved so mad props to whoever can help me figure it out. I've been thinking about this for more than an hour and it's bugging me.

Consider the function f(z) = 1/(sin(pi/z)).

It has singular points at z=0 and z=1/n (where n is an integer). However, my book says each singular point except z=0 is isolated. (An isolated singular point is one where every epsilon neighborhood around that point is analytic.) Anyways, the argument is that if we find any epsilon neighborhood around z=0, then we can always find a 1/n (where n is an integer) inside this neighborhood. As we know, 1/n is a singular point hence there doesn't exist a neighborhood around z=0 that is analytic. This I understand.

However, I don't get why this same argument couldn't be applied to the other singular points z=1/n. Namely, for any epsilon neighborhood around z=1/n, we can find some other z=1/m inside this neighborhood... can't we?

My OCD prevents me from moving on forward in the chapter until I've figured this out exactly. It's driving me nuts. My prof doesn't have office hours until Tuesday of next week and he's notorious for not answering emails. If any of yall can help me figure this out before then, it'd be great.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Uh, consider 1/3. Then the closest 1/n's around it are 1/4 and 1/2. Choose the neighbourhood about 1/3 with radius less than min(|1/4 - 1/3|, |1/2 - 1/3|), so we could pick 1/30, for example. We're dealing with (9/30, 11/30). Find a 1/n in there other than 1/3. You really really shouldn't have spent an hour on this...

Are you sure you understand why 0 is not isolated?
 
Power clean, are you sure you've got the correct definition? Isolated means there is *an* open neighbourhood of the point on which it is analytic (except for the singularity), not for every neighbourhood. (That would mean that every analytic function with tow singularties would never have isolated singularities.)

It is not an isolated singulairty if *for all* nbds there is another singularity in that nbd. The negation of "for all" is "there exists"
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K