Newtons law of universal gravitational question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interpretation of Newton's law of universal gravitation in relation to satellite altitude and planetary radius. Participants clarify that the distance used in gravitational calculations should be the distance between the centers of mass of the two bodies, meaning the radius of the planet must be added to the altitude of the satellite. Specifically, a satellite's altitude of 35,000 km is understood to be measured from the planet's center of mass, ensuring accurate gravitational force calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's law of universal gravitation
  • Knowledge of satellite orbital mechanics
  • Familiarity with concepts of center of mass
  • Basic physics terminology related to altitude and distance
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the calculation of gravitational force using Newton's law
  • Explore satellite orbit dynamics and altitude measurement
  • Learn about the significance of center of mass in gravitational interactions
  • Investigate common misconceptions in physics terminology
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching gravitational concepts, and anyone interested in satellite mechanics and orbital calculations.

redruM
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
http://www.boredofstudies.org/community/attachment.php?s=&postid=266675

when doing this question, isn't the radius of the planet supposed to be added to the altitude of the satellite?
having said that, would the term 'orbit' mean that the satellite is 35 000km away from the centre of mass, ie the centre of the planet and hence the radius is already included?

thanks for any replies :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
the distance d is the distance between the centres of mass of the two bodies. so yes, the radius of the planet should be added to the altitude of the satellite.

i assume that in that sample question, 35,000km refers to the distance from the planet's centre of mass, otherwise the calculation would be innacurate. however, i would generally understand the orbit altitude to refer to the altitude above the surface of the planet.

as long as you specify what you mean by certain terms, it doesn't really matter (the example you gave doesn't do this). this is physics, not semantics.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K