Faraday's and Ampere's circuital law

  • Thread starter Thread starter robert25pl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Faraday's law and Ampere's circuital law in the context of electromagnetic fields. The original poster presents an electric field in free space and seeks to find the corresponding magnetic field that satisfies these laws.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss computing the curl of the electric field and integrating it to find the magnetic field. There are questions regarding the correctness of the derived magnetic field and its alignment with textbook answers.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaged in verifying calculations and discussing discrepancies between their results and those found in reference materials. Some guidance has been offered regarding the computation of the curl and the application of Faraday's law, but there remains uncertainty about the final form of the magnetic field.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a potential difference in the expected direction of the magnetic field compared to the textbook answer, indicating a possible misunderstanding or misalignment in the initial conditions or assumptions made in the problem setup.

robert25pl
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
For electric field [tex]E=E_{0}e^{-\alpha}^{z}cos(\omega t)a_{x}[/tex] in free space (J=0), find B that satisfies Faraday’s law in differential form and then determine if the pair of E and B satisfy Ampere’s circuital law in differential form.

[tex]\nabla \times E = -\frac{\partial B}{\partial t}[/tex]

Can someone give me hint for next step. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Compute the curl.You should have written it (for ease and rigor)

[tex]\vec{E}(z,t)=E_{0}e^{-\alpha z} \cos \omega t \ \vec{i} [/itex] <br /> <br /> After that,u need to integrate wrt time the negative of the curl you had just computed.<br /> <br /> Daniel.[/tex]
 
From computed curl:

[tex]\frac{\partial E\vec{i}}{\partial z} = -\frac{\partial B\vec{y}}{\partial t}[/tex]

And for B I got:

[tex]B =-E_{0}\alpha\omega e^{-\alpha z} \sin \omega t \ \vec{j}[/tex]

The answer for B in the book is different so I think I'm doing something wrong
 
You might.Here's the curl

[tex]\nabla\times\vec{E}=\left|\begin{array}{ccc}\vec{i}& \vec{j} &\vec{k}\\\frac{\partial}{\partial x}& \frac{\partial}{\partial y}& \frac{\partial}{\partial z}\\ E_{0}e^{-\alpha z}\cos \omega t & 0 & 0 \end{array} \right|[/tex]

Okay?

Daniel.
 
This is what I got for curl
[tex]-E_{0}\alpha e^{-\alpha z} \cos \omega t \ \vec{j}[/tex]
then using Faraday's law
[tex]\nabla \times E = -\frac{\partial B}{\partial t}[/tex]

[tex]B=\frac{E_{0}}{\omega}\alpha e^{-\alpha z} \sin \omega t \ \vec{j}[/tex]

I fixed what was wrong, but I still have problem with vector j. Book says it should be z.
 
It can't,unless there was something different to start with...

Your work is correct.

Daniel.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K