Quantum Mech. Si Wavefunction probability

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the wavefunctions of Px and Py orbitals in the hydrogen atom, specifically focusing on the integrals of these wavefunctions. The original poster questions the values of certain integrals involving these normalized wavefunctions and seeks clarification on the physical meaning of the equations presented.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the meaning of the integrals involving the wavefunctions, particularly questioning the significance of the variable 't' and its relation to time or volume. There is also exploration of the orthogonality of wavefunctions and the implications of boundary conditions on the integrals.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the physical meaning of the integrals and the properties of wavefunctions, while others express uncertainty about the mathematical concepts involved. Multiple interpretations of the variable 't' and the nature of the integrals are being explored, indicating a productive exchange of ideas.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the original poster's background in a freshman chemistry course, suggesting that some participants may be grappling with advanced concepts without full prior knowledge of the necessary calculus. This context may influence the depth of understanding and the types of questions being raised.

mkkrnfoo85
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Question:

If Si1 represents the wavefunction of a Px orbital in the hydrogen atom, and Si2 represents the wavefunction of a Py orbital in the same hydrogen atom. Si1 and Si2 are both normalized wavefunctions.

a) what is the value of integral:Si1*Si2*dt. ?
b) what is the value of integral:Si1*Si1*dt. ?

From what my teacher was saying during lecture, integral:(Si^2)dt = 1, which represents the probability that a particle has to be somewhere there. (I don't quite understand what this equation means). Would someone this to me? I'm pretty sure answer (b) is 1, because of what I've learned, but for (a), the answer is supposed to be 0. Please help. THanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bump. please help.
 
I think I know the answers, but when you use the variable 't' in this context, what physical quantity do you understand that to represent?
 
Janitor said:
I think I know the answers, but when you use the variable 't' in this context, what physical quantity do you understand that to represent?

My guess would be that it stands for time. The wave function would spit out the probable position of the electron in that orbital.
 
'dt' stands for a VOLUME QUANTITY (sorry). I just don't know why 'integral:Si1Si2 = 0'

'Si' is a normalized wavefunction, and the integration is carried out over all space.


Can someone explain the physical meaning of that? I know it has something to do with probability of a particle being in that vicinity. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Okay, I was hoping dt stood for a 3D volume element. I've got a book on electronic structure by W.A. Harrison which says

It is known also that the existence of boundary conditions (such as the condition that the wave functions vanish outside a given region of space) will restrict the solutions [to the time-independent Schroedinger equation for a central potential] to a discrete set of eignevalues E, and that these different eigenstates can be taken to be orthogonal to each other [which makes your first integral vanish]. It is important to recognize that eigenstates are wave functions which an electron may or may not have. If an electron has a certain eigenstate, it is said that the corresponding state is occupied by the electron. However, the various states exist whether or not they are occupied.

Legendre polynomials are used in solving the stationary-state 3D central-potential TISE because Legendre's differential equation arises in the process of solving the equation. The Legendre polynomials are orthogonal functions.

I'm not sure that anything I have written really helps too much in explaining the "physical meaning of that," though.
 
The spherical harmonics are involved in the wavefunctions:

[tex]\psi_{nlm}(r,\vartheta,\varphi) =C_{nlm}R_{nl}(r)Y_{lm}(\vartheta,\varphi)[/tex]

U have to discuss the case when

[tex]\{n,l,m\}=\{2,1,-1\} \ \mbox{and} \ \{n,l,m\}= \{2,1,0\}[/tex]

I think u want to compute these numbers

[tex]I=:\iiint_{R^{3}} \psi^{*}_{2,1,-1}(r,\vartheta,\varphi) \psi_{2,1,0}(r,\vartheta,\varphi) \ r^{2} \ dr \ d\Omega[/tex]

[tex]J=:\iiint_{R^{3}} \psi^{*}_{2,1,-1}(r,\vartheta,\varphi) \psi_{2,1,-1}(r,\vartheta,\varphi) \ r^{2} \ dr \ d\Omega[/tex]

Keep in mind that

[tex]\iint Y^{*}_{l',m'}(\vartheta,\varphi) Y_{l,m}(\vartheta,\varphi) \ d\Omega = \delta_{l'l}\delta_{m'm}[/tex]

and the hydrogenoid wavefunctions are orthonormalized.

Daniel.
 
Last edited:
Thanks, that sort of cleared up some of my concepts, esp. that site on atomic orbitals. I don't really understand dextercioby's explanation, I'm only in a freshman 2nd semester chem course, and haven't really covered double and trip. integrals in calc. yet. I may never get to your explanation any time soon either. But thanks.
 
  • #10
Then it surely is something devious with your course.Speaking about wavefunctions for hydrogen without the calculus part fully covered...

Daniel.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
7K