Shouldn't Conservation of Momentum Be Conserved in this Problem?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conservation of momentum in a problem involving a sledge and n persons jumping off. It concludes that when individuals jump off one at a time (method b), the sledge achieves a higher final velocity compared to when they all jump off simultaneously (method a). This is due to the decreasing mass of the sledge as each person jumps off, allowing each subsequent jumper to impart a greater velocity to the sledge. The mathematical demonstration using the equation V=(mv)/M illustrates this principle effectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Third Law of Motion
  • Basic principles of conservation of momentum
  • Familiarity with the concept of center of mass
  • Ability to perform basic physics calculations involving mass and velocity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Newton's Third Law in dynamic systems
  • Explore advanced topics in conservation of momentum with varying mass systems
  • Learn about center of mass calculations in multi-body systems
  • Investigate real-world applications of momentum conservation in sports and engineering
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators explaining momentum concepts, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of motion in constrained systems.

ColdFusion85
Messages
141
Reaction score
0
Shouldn't Conservation of Momentum Be Conserved in this Problem?

Alright, I am deeply confused on this problem. It goes like this:

A big sledge is standing at rest on a horizontal icy surface. A rail is placed in such a way that the sledge can move only along a straight line. It is assumed that the sledge moves without friction. At one end of the sledge n persons stand. They all have the same mass.
These n persons can now leave the sledge in two different ways:

(a) All n persons run to the front of the sledge and jump off simultaneously, all with velocity v relative to the sledge. This velocity is along the direction in which the sledge is constrained to move.
(b) One at a time, a person runs to the end of the sledge and jumps off with velocity v relative to the sledge while the remaining persons stand still. This process continues until they have all left the sledge.

Demonstrate which of the two methods imparts to the sledge the highest velocity relative to the ice.


I would think that both would result in the same velocity, but if I had to pick one answer, it would be (a), since the total mass of all n people, M would impart a larger velocity V on the sledge than one individual would at a time. The correct answer is (b) however! The only thing I can picture is that the center of mass would be more towards the back if each individual jumped off one at a time, and since the velocity would be directed in that direction (3rd law, equal and opposite forces), this would impart the higher velocity. But then wouldn't this be the same as if all people jumped off and imparted the same total velocity V on the sledge? It seems that Conservation of Momentum should say that both cases would produce the same velocity, if one takes into account only external forces.

Can ANYONE explain as to why the correct answer is case B?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why not try to work it out for yourself, plugging in some numbers? Take 3 people with mass 75kg who run off at 10 m/s relative to the sled. You'll see that if they all run off together, each person has to work against the mass of all the other people. And if they run off one at a time, each successive person has to work against a smaller mass than the one before him, thus each successive person has a greater effect on the final momentum of the sled.
 
wow that becomes so obvious when one looks at it from that point of view. basically you solve MV=mv for V, where V = velocity of center of mass. So we have V=(mv)/M. if they all jump off together they impart a velocity of 3.33 m/s,where as if they go off one by one, each successive person imparts a higer velocity each time. thanks a lot tom!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K