What will be the relativistic change in momentum?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relativistic change in momentum of a falling object, specifically considering the effects of gravity and relativistic speeds. Participants are exploring how to derive the final momentum given initial conditions and the influence of gravitational acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to relate initial and final momentum using relativistic equations, questioning how to derive the final velocity from gravitational effects. Some express uncertainty about the applicability of Newtonian models in a relativistic context.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing various insights and approaches. Some suggest using differential equations to model the motion under gravity, while others emphasize the need to consider relativistic effects on momentum. There is no explicit consensus on the method to be used.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of deriving velocity from given parameters and the potential need for approximations related to gravitational acceleration. There is mention of the problem being standard in special relativity, indicating a recognized complexity in the scenario.

gulsen
Messages
215
Reaction score
0
a falling object has a measured momentum p0 at t0 and p1 at t1 by an observer on ground. if p0, t0 and t1 are known,what will be the relativistic change in momentum?(assuming that only force affecting is gravity force)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gulsen said:
a falling object has a measured momentum p0 at t0 and p1 at t1 by an observer on ground. if p0, t0 and t1 are known,what will be the relativistic change in momentum?(assuming that only force affecting is gravity force)
I am assuming this is some kind of cosmic ray particle with relativistic energy.

I am a little beat tonight, but why would it not just be [itex]\Delta p = p_1 - p_0[/itex]? You measure momentum in the same (earth) frame of reference both times:

[tex]p_0 = \gamma_0m_0v_0[/tex] and later:

[tex]p_1 = \gamma_1m_0v_1[/tex]

AM
 
and that's the problem. v1 is unknown. we only know p0, t0 and t1, and a function gravity related to the distance r (say we know g(r) and m -- still GmM/r^2 in GR?). how do we derieve v1 from these?
 
The problem is nasty,to say the least.It's a standard problem in SR,so i assume (i'm not sure,i don't have the books) it can be encountered in classic texts like Wheeler's SR.

It's a relativistic particle in a Newtonian gravitational potential.It falls freely,so you can say that the acceleration is constant and equal to "g"...Solve it or search for uniformly accelerated particle in SR...

Daniel.
 
Edit: Ignore this post for now... look at those below~

Yes, you can still use the Newtonian model for gravity. Just set up a differential equation

[tex]\frac{GM}{r^2} = \frac{d^2r}{dt^2}[/tex]

with initial condition

[tex]\frac{dr}{dt}\biggr |_{t=0} = \frac{p_0}{m_0}[/tex]

and solve for [itex]dr/dt[/itex], ie. the velocity, then use your solution to find the velocity at time [itex]t[/itex].

If you are allowed to make the approximation

[tex]\frac{d^2r}{dt^2} = g[/tex]

where [itex]g[/itex] is the acceleration at sea level, then the DE is much simpler.

Edit: Though I haven't though about it too much, you may actually have to use the [itex]g[/itex] approximation unless you are also given [itex]r(0)[/itex].
 
Last edited:
No,no,it's a relativistic particle.It has 4 momentum...

[tex]\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^{2}(t)}{c^{2}}}} v(t)\right) = g[/tex]

Daniel.
 
Last edited:
The derivative of momentum isn't acceleration. You mean

[tex]\frac{d}{dt} \left(\frac{ v(t)}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2(t)}{c^2}}}\right)=g[/tex]

but other than that, you're actually probably right. It might expect you to use that form for the DE. Time to dig up SRT books~
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K