How Do You Calculate the Velocity of Two Colliding Cars That Stick Together?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the velocity of two colliding cars that stick together after an inelastic collision. The scenario involves two cars of equal mass colliding at an intersection, with one traveling east and the other north. The problem includes parameters such as the distance of skid marks and the coefficient of friction.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the conservation of momentum in inelastic collisions and question the correct application of vector addition to determine the final velocity of the combined vehicles. There are attempts to express the final velocity in terms of the initial velocities of the cars, leading to confusion about the correct formula.

Discussion Status

Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, with some participants questioning their understanding of vector operations and the implications of the collision dynamics. Guidance has been offered regarding the use of momentum conservation and the nature of the collision, but no consensus on the final answer has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity introduced by the locked wheels and the coefficient of friction, which affects the motion after the collision. There is acknowledgment of the need to consider these factors in calculations, but some express uncertainty about how to incorporate them effectively.

~angel~
Messages
150
Reaction score
0
Please help.

Consider the following two-car accident: Two cars of equal mass m collide at an intersection. Driver E was traveling eastward, and driver N, northward. After the collision, the two cars remain joined together and slide, with locked wheels, before coming to rest. Police on the scene measure the length d of the skid marks to be 9 meters. The coefficient of friction mu between the locked wheels and the road is equal to 0.9.

Let the speeds of drivers E and N prior to the collision be denoted by v_e and v_n, respectively. Find v^2, the square of the speed of the two-car system the instant after the collision.
Express your answer terms of v_e and v_n.

I tried using the vector addition and ended up with v_e^2 + v_n^2, which was incorrect (I also saw the duty tutor, and he said it was correct). I just wanted to find out the way to determine the final velocity of the combined vehicles.

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let the one traveling east with have velocity [tex]\vec{v}_{E}[/tex] the one traveling north having velocity [tex]\vec{v}_{N}[/tex].
Let the final velocity be [tex]\vec{v}[/tex]
The speeds are described with [tex]v_{E},v_{N},v[/tex] respectively.
Since we have an inelastic collision, conservation of momentum says
[tex]m\vec{v}_{E}+m\vec{v}_{N}=2m\vec{v}[/tex]
where m is the mass of a car.
Do you see where you made a mistake now?
 
I also have to do this question and got the answer v_e^2 + v_n^2. I don't see where I have made the mistake.
 
janiexo said:
I also have to do this question and got the answer v_e^2 + v_n^2. I don't see where I have made the mistake.
Well, have you looked over my answer?
What is it you don't understand there?
 
I don't see how i am meant to use that relationship to find v^2
 
Well, dividing with 2m, you've got:
[tex]\vec{v}=\frac{1}{2}(\vec{v}_{E}+\vec{v}_{N})[/tex]
So, given this vector equation, how can you determine the squared speeds?
 
so would it just be
V^2 = ((v_e+v_n)^2)/4
?
 
janiexo said:
so would it just be
V^2 = ((v_e+v_n)^2)/4
?
No; you must use the fact that [tex]\vec{v}_{E}\cdot\vec{v}_{N}=0[/tex]
You are familiar with vectors, right?
 
Last edited:
Oh, ok, so in that cast when i expand the ((v_e+v_n)^2) I actually get v_e^2 + v_n^2. So the answer is actually (v_e^2 + v_n^2)/4 ?
Sorry, vectors are new to me so I don't really quite know how to work with them yet.
 
  • #10
"So the answer is actually (v_e^2 + v_n^2)/4 ?"
Correct!
 
  • #11
We want to know the initial speed on the 9m trajectory. So calculating the acceleration: 0.9g. vf^2=(0.9g)(2)(9)=16.2.

So the total momentum is 16.2m. So now we know:

v1^2+v2^2=16.2

v2^2=(16.2^2)-v1^2
v1^2=(16.2^2)-v2^2

With the current information you can't determine the velocities of the vehicles before collision. But at the moment of collision, the velocity would be 4 m/s north of east.

You have calculated algebraically, but vectors always add up geometrically. That is your mistake.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Awesome! Thanks for bearing with me
 
  • #13
janiexo said:
Awesome! Thanks for bearing with me
No problem.
 
  • #14
Oh ok...thanks for your help. :smile:
 
  • #15
If you were to determine the speed of car N (who claims that thye were travellingat less than 14m/s), when car E was traveling at 12m/s, KE = (m*(v_e^2+v_n^2))/4, and a friction force acting in the opposite direction (work done by it = 2*0.9*m*g*d), how would you equate both. Because, after the collision, the car traveled a distance of 9m, so to determine car Ns speed, you have to include, distance, frction, the speed of car E, etc. Just not sure.
Thanks.
 
  • #16
There is the fact of the locks that is quite disturbing and not counting in my calculations. The locks certainly have a coefficient of friction which slows down the wheels.
 
  • #17
Werg22 said:
There is the fact of the locks that is quite disturbing and not counting in my calculations. The locks certainly have a coefficient of friction which slows down the wheels.
No; the locked condition is there so that cars can be regarded as strictly SLIDING, rather than sliding&rolling.
The latter problem is a lot more difficult to solve; hence, the sliding condition.
 
  • #18
Ok thanks! But in the end did I get the right awnser?
 
  • #19
Werg22 said:
But in the end did I get the right awnser?
I haven't checked yet..
 
  • #20
I don't think so I did a mistake I think. So the acceleration on the cars after collision is 0.9g=8.829. And vi^2=(0.9g)(2)(9)=159

vi=12.6 m/s

Sorry for this.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K