What is the proper name for this numerical integration method?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter NSX
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the proper naming and pronunciation of the numerical integration method commonly referred to as Runge-Kutta. Participants explore variations in spelling and pronunciation, as well as the significance of these differences in academic contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the correct term is "Runge-Kutta," citing sources like MathWorld for support.
  • Others mention variations in pronunciation, with some hearing it pronounced as "Runga-Kutta."
  • One participant humorously suggests that the correct spelling is more important than pronunciation, referencing the Norwegian perspective.
  • There is a playful exchange regarding the pronunciation of other names in physics, such as de Broglie and Ångström, highlighting the challenges of accurate pronunciation in English.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that "Runge-Kutta" is the correct spelling, but there are differing opinions on pronunciation and the importance of spelling versus pronunciation.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the spelling variations and how they relate to pronunciation, indicating a lack of consensus on the significance of these differences.

NSX
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
Runga-Kutta or Runge-Kutta

What's the correct name for this method?

On google, there's more hits for the latter, at 193 to 37, but what did you guys learn it as?

My prof calls it Runge-Katta in his lecture notes, and Runga-Katta in the problem set.

:confused:

Thanks in advance.

[edit]
I misspelled Kutta as Katta :redface:
But thanks for pointing out Runga vs. Runge
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Last edited:
NSX said:
What's the correct name for this method?

On google, there's more hits for the latter, at 193 to 37, but what did you guys learn it as?

My prof calls it Runge-Katta in his lecture notes, and Runga-Katta in the problem set.

:confused:

Thanks in advance.

it's spelled (spelt?) runge-kutta but I've heard it pronounced runga-kutta
 
Arildno should tell us.He's Norwegian.The correct spelling of their names is much more important than pronounciation,right?

Daniel.
 
dextercioby said:
Arildno should tell us.He's Norwegian.The correct spelling of their names is much more important than pronounciation,right?

Daniel.

Tell that to de Broglie :biggrin:
 
dextercioby said:
Arildno should tell us.He's Norwegian.The correct spelling of their names is much more important than pronounciation,right?

Daniel.
Agreed..:approve:
 
Galileo,you tell it to Schwarzschild...:-p

Daniel.
 
Great guys!

Thanks so much!

As for pronounciation, my prof calls it "Runga" Katta too

<_<
 
Galileo said:
Tell that to de Broglie :biggrin:

Or poor Ångström, both of whose vowels get mangled in typical (American, at least) English pronunciation, even if we remember to put in the diacritical marks. :cry:

No wonder people usually use nanometers instead nowadays!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K