Calculating Potential Height of Kinetic Energy Jump

  • Thread starter Thread starter Linco
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the potential height a sprinter could achieve by converting kinetic energy into potential energy. The subject area includes concepts from mechanics, specifically kinetic and potential energy relationships.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between kinetic energy and potential energy, questioning the necessity of mass in calculations. There are discussions about the conversion of energy types and the implications of the formulas provided.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes various interpretations of the energy conversion process, with some participants offering guidance on the equations involved. There is an ongoing exploration of how to manipulate the equations to find height, but no consensus on the final answer has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion regarding the application of mass in the equations and the derivation of gravitational acceleration. There are references to specific values and assumptions that may not be universally accepted within the discussion.

Linco
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
If a sprinter running at a speed of 10 meters per second could convert his/her kinetic energy into upward motion, how high could he/she jump?

I understand that KE= 1/2 mass X (Speed)2 But I am really not sure how I could do this without a mass.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At the point where all is kinetic energy has been converted in potential energy.. how high will he be?
 
U don't need the mass of the sprinter in this elementary setup.

Daniel.
 
Well this elementary setup doesn't seem so elementary to me. The point where his potential energy turns into kinetic energy will be the first instance he is in motion.
 
It's the other way around.He's high-jumping.Which means that his KE converts into PE and not viceversa.

Daniel.
 
I feel stupid now. so if he used the same amount of energy he would be able to jump 10 meters high?
 
No. Figure it out. Set the initial KE equal to the final gravitational PE. Then you can solve for the maximum height.
 
This is where I am lost the only formulas that the book provides is PE=mgh and KE= 1/2mv*

So i don't see how i can solve this PE=mgh=1/2m(100)=KE
 
That's the correct equation: [itex]mgh = 1/2 m v^2[/itex]; now just solve for h. (Divide both sides by mg!)
 
  • #10
I think if I would of realized that mass and weight are directly proportional sooner I would of had less trouble with this. So the height would equal 50 meters?
 
  • #11
[itex]h = v^2/(2g)[/itex]. Plug in the numbers: v = 10 m/s; g = 9.8 m/s^2.
 
  • #12
Ok so one meter. Now the question is how did you get this formula and where did you get g=9.8 from. Wouldn't mgh=1/2mv* come out to h=1/2v*? I understand that 9.8 is that rate that things fall but I am not sure how this plugs into all this. Isn't mg that weight of the object?
 
  • #13
U mean ~5 m...No,it wouldn't come out to what u've written.You can simplify only through "m"...

Daniel.
 
  • #14
I didn't see the 2g in there so it's .5 meters. So when simplying you would dived 1/2m by mg to get 2g right?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
55
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K