Conservation of angular momentum of a turntable

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the conservation of angular momentum in a system involving a turntable and a record. The turntable is modeled as a circular disk with a defined moment of inertia, rotating at a constant angular velocity. The problem explores the effects of friction when a second disk is dropped onto the first, leading to questions about final angular velocity, kinetic energy, and average torque during deceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the final angular velocity of the combined disks and the expression for final kinetic energy, raising questions about the conservation of energy and the role of friction.
  • Some participants attempt to derive expressions for kinetic energy and torque, while others express confusion about the correct formulation and simplification of their answers.
  • Questions arise regarding the calculation of angular momentum and the relationship between torque and angular acceleration.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided insights into the kinetic energy calculations and the relationship between angular momentum and torque. There is an ongoing exploration of different interpretations and approaches to the problem, with no explicit consensus reached on the final answers.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem involves assumptions about the system's behavior under friction and the time interval during which the turntable decelerates. There is also mention of homework constraints that may limit the information available for solving the problem.

~angel~
Messages
150
Reaction score
0
Please help.

Consider a turntable to be a circular disk of moment of inertia I_t rotating at a constant angular velocity omega_i around an axis through the center and perpendicular to the plane of the disk (the disk's "primary axis of symmetry"). The axis of the disk is vertical and the disk is supported by frictionless bearings. The motor of the turntable is off, so there is no external torque being applied to the axis. Another disk (a record) is dropped onto the first such that it lands coaxially (the axes coincide). The moment of inertia of the record is I_r. The initial angular velocity of the second disk is zero.

There is friction between the two disks.

After this "rotational collision," the disks will eventually rotate with the same angular velocity.

What is the final angular velocity, omega_f, of the two disks?
Express omega_f in terms of I_t, I_r, and omega_i.

Because of friction, kinetic energy is not conserved while the disks' surfaces slip over each other. What is the final kinetic energy, K_f, of the two spinning disks?
Express the final kinetic energy in terms of I_t, I_r, and the initial kinetic energy K_i of the two-disk system. No angular velocities should appear in your answer.

Assume that the turntable deccelerated during time deltat before reaching the final angular velocity ( deltat is the time interval between the moment when the top disk is dropped and the time that the disks begin to spin at the same angular velocity). What was the average torque, \avg{\tau}, acting on the bottom disk due to friction with the record?
Express the torque in terms of I_t, omega_i, omega_f, and deltat.

Ok, I know the answer to the first question, which is (I_t*omega_i)/(I_t+I_r). But I am lost on the whole KE thing. My answer was ((I_t+I_r)*(I_t*K_i))/(2*(I_t^2+2*I_t*I_r+I_r^2)), which was incorrect.

Any help would be appreciated for the last question as well.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
~angel~ said:
Because of friction, kinetic energy is not conserved while the disks' surfaces slip over each other. What is the final kinetic energy, K_f, of the two spinning disks?
Express the final kinetic energy in terms of I_t, I_r, and the initial kinetic energy K_i of the two-disk system. No angular velocities should appear in your answer.

I'm not sure how you came up with that answer. But you should already know that
[tex]K_i = \frac{1}{2}I_t\omega _i^2[/tex]

So express [tex]\omega _i[/tex] in terms of K_i and I_t and substitute it in the equation for K_f:

[tex]K_f = \frac{1}{2}(I_t + I_r)(\frac{I_t\omega _i}{I_t + I_r})^2[/tex]

So show us whether your answer will be the same as the one in the textbook.
 
I worked it out...the reason i got it wrong is because I put Ki instead of 2ki.

The answer is (I_t+I_r)*(I_t*2*K_i))/(2*(I_t^2+2*I_t*I_r+I_r^2)

The answer is long because you need to eliminate any angular velocity variables.
 
Last edited:
You mean:


[tex]\frac{(I_t + I_r)(2I_tK_i)}{2I_t^2 + 2I_tI_r + I_r^2}[/tex]

?

Then it is simplified to

[tex]\frac{I_t}{I_t + I_r}K_i[/tex]
 
Yeah. Just didnt simplify though. How would you determine the torque when the turntable decelerates?
 
Easy,

[tex]\tau_{av} = \frac{\Delta L}{\Delta t}[/tex],

where L is the angular momentum.
 
lol...ok. These questions are weird. I found the hardest question to be the easiest for me, and the easy ones to be hard.
Thanks
 
heh i got the first 2 easy, but I am totally lost on the third, how do u work out the angular momentum?
 
[tex]L = I \omega[/tex]
 
  • #10
heh i got it, but i knew that, i just didnt realize i needed to use torque= I*alpha, nstead of momentum/time. then u solve alpha down into terms of intital and final angular velocity over time, and bingo
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
25K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K