How to Approximate Solutions for an Impossible Antiderivative?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Naeem
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding an approximate value for the function y given the differential equation dy/dx = e^x / x with the initial condition y(1) = 2. Participants note that finding an antiderivative is stated to be impossible, prompting exploration of alternative methods for approximation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various methods such as Euler's Method, linear approximations, and the possibility of using series expansions like McLaurin's series for e^x. Questions arise about how to apply these methods analytically and the validity of certain approaches.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing different techniques and questioning the applicability of methods. Some suggest using technology for calculations, while others seek to understand the analytical approach better. There is no explicit consensus on a single method yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants express concerns about the impossibility of finding an antiderivative and the implications of this on their approaches. The initial condition provided may influence the methods discussed.

Naeem
Messages
193
Reaction score
0
Q. If dy/dx = e^x / x and y(1) = 2; find an approximate value for y(3). Use a technique from calculus or technology to help you solve the problem. It is impossible to find an antiderivative.

My thoughts / ideas:

I thought this was a separable equation, and could separate the x and y variables and then may be just integrate both sides.

But I don't think this is possible, Since the question clearly says "It is impossible to find an antiderivative".

Any ideas.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Linear approximations? Eulers method?
 
Yeah, I think you are right, Euler's Method would work definetly.

How about using calculus. any ideas.

I can make a 'spreadsheet' in Excel that can calculate the differential at the specified point

using Euler's Method and Euler's Improved method.

But any ideas on how to actually use calculus.
 
Euler's method and linear approximations are calculus methods.
 
I used the fact that delta(y) is roughly equal to delta(x) times dy/dx. Then you come up with y(3)-y(1)=(e^1/1)(3-1). I think this gives y(3)= 2e+2. Could someone verify that this is the correct approximation?

Thanks, Joe
 
Ok, Let us give up technology for a moment ,and actually think , how to solve this problem analytically using calculus.

I know we could use Euler's Method or Linear Approximation, but how do we apply them analytically .. How to get started?


Please help!
 
1)I think that you can make fast work on this question by using McClaurin's expansion for e^x, then divide it later by x to find dy/dx (in a summation notation for easy integration later)
2) For the second part, since the initial value is given we can use the fundamental theorem of calculus to find a short cut to the general form of the solution.
(i.e) [tex]y=\int_{1}^{x} f(t)dt +2[/tex]

f(t) here is simply the series expansion for [tex]e^x/x[/tex]
 
Naeem said:
Q. If dy/dx = e^x / x and y(1) = 2; find an approximate value for y(3). Use a technique from calculus or technology to help you solve the problem. It is impossible to find an antiderivative.
My thoughts / ideas:

I thought this was a separable equation, and could separate the x and y variables and then may be just integrate both sides.

But I don't think this is possible, Since the question clearly says "It is impossible to find an antiderivative".
Any ideas.


I resent that and claim it's incorrect,because

[tex]\int \frac{e^{x}}{x} \ dx =\mbox{Ei}\left(x\right) +C[/tex]


Daniel.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K