Pi is said to be discovered by ancients

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter JamesU
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pi
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the historical understanding of the mathematical constant pi, its discovery by ancient civilizations, and the nature of its value as an irrational number. Participants explore the implications of approximating pi and the geometric properties of circles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question how ancient civilizations could have discovered pi if its exact value is unknown, suggesting that their understanding may have been limited to approximations.
  • Others argue that the definition of pi as the ratio of circumference to diameter qualifies as a discovery, regardless of the precision of its value.
  • One participant notes that pi is an irrational number, emphasizing that its decimal representation is infinite and non-repeating, which implies that both ancient and modern calculations are approximations.
  • There is a request for a rigorous geometric proof that all circles are similar, with one participant proposing an approach based on the concept of regular polygons and scaling.
  • Another participant reiterates the need for a rigorous proof of the similarity of circles, expanding on the scaling argument and providing a link to additional resources.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of pi's discovery and its implications. While some agree on the definition and properties of pi, there is no consensus on the historical context of its discovery or the rigor of the geometric proofs discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the limitations of their arguments, particularly regarding the rigor of geometric proofs and the nature of approximations in the context of pi.

JamesU
Gold Member
Messages
828
Reaction score
3
Pi is said to be discovered by ancients, but if even we don't know the EXACT number of pi, how could they, or was theirs just a close estimate of pi?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Pi is just the constant defined by the circumference over the diameter. Recognizing that the ratio doesn't change between circles qualifies as the discovery of pi. It's an interesting exercise. Also try to show the same constant relates the radius to the area. And be careful that you're arguments aren't circular (poor pun intended). You can't use any theorems that depend on what you're trying to show.

Looking at the discoveries of the ancients often makes you feel like the lady who walks out of one of Shakespeare's plays and say "I don't get what the big deal is. All he did was string a bunch of famous cliches together." Some of what they did seems simple but try to be the first guy to do it without modern machinery.
 
Good point, I never thought opf it that way
 
Pi is an irrational number. This means that it is non-repeating, non-terminating. In other words, it is infinite in length and, unlike 1/3 = 0.33333..., it does not have some infinitely repeating pattern of digits in its decimal expansion. So, in short, the ancients determination of the value of pi was, just as ours is, just an approximation. No one may know exactly the value of pi. But, for all practical purposes, an approximation is sufficient.
 
How would one prove precisely (using geometry) that all circles are similar? The only way that I can think of is to imagine a circle as a regular polygon with an infinite number of sides. Since it's easy to prove that any two n-sided regular polygons are similar, it should therefore extend to circles. However, this isn't very rigorous. Anyone know of a way to prove it rigorously using classical geometry?
 
Manchot said:
How would one prove precisely (using geometry) that all circles are similar? The only way that I can think of is to imagine a circle as a regular polygon with an infinite number of sides. Since it's easy to prove that any two n-sided regular polygons are similar, it should therefore extend to circles. However, this isn't very rigorous. Anyone know of a way to prove it rigorously using classical geometry?
If you accept a definition of similarity in terms of scaling :

1. translate the center, c1 to new center c2
2. scale by a factor r2/r1 about center (since every point is an equal distance from the center, scaling the radius by a factor x scales the distance of every point from the center by this same factor)

As for the OP : http://www.geom.uiuc.edu/~huberty/math5337/groupe/overview.html
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 171 ·
6
Replies
171
Views
13K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K