Hard Q to take a derivative of

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter the4thcafeavenue
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative Hard
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the derivative of the function y=(x)/((x+2)(x+3)(x+4)). Participants explore various methods for differentiation, including the quotient rule, partial fractions, and logarithmic differentiation, while addressing the complexities and nuances of each approach.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using the quotient rule for differentiation, defining u(x)=(x+2)(x+3)(x+4) and deriving the formula for dy/dx.
  • Another participant proposes a partial fractions method, providing a detailed breakdown of the coefficients and resulting derivative.
  • Some participants express appreciation for the partial fractions method, noting its educational value despite its complexity.
  • A different method involving logarithmic differentiation is introduced, with a participant highlighting potential issues with nonpositive values of y when taking logarithms.
  • There is a correction regarding a potential typo in the logarithmic differentiation method, which is acknowledged by participants.
  • One participant shares a personal preference for expanding the denominator and using either the quotient rule or product and chain rule, presenting an alternative derivative expression.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the validity of multiple methods for finding the derivative, but there is no consensus on which method is superior or preferred. Various competing views and techniques remain present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some methods discussed may involve assumptions about the function's domain, particularly regarding the logarithmic differentiation approach and its limitations with nonpositive values.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in calculus, particularly in differentiation techniques and the exploration of multiple methods for solving similar problems, may find this discussion beneficial.

the4thcafeavenue
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
y=(x)/((x+2)(x+3)(x+4)).
how to do u take the derivative? HELP!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) DON'T PANIC!

2) Define [tex]u(x)=(x+2)(x+3)(x+4)[/tex]

3) Use this so that we have: [tex]y(x)=\frac{x}{u(x)}[/tex]
By the rule for differentiating a ratio between 2 functions, we have:
[tex]\frac{dy}{dx}=\frac{1*u(x)-x\frac{du}{dx}}{u^{2}}=\frac{1}{u}-\frac{x}{u^{2}}\frac{du}{dx}[/tex]

4) Evaluate [tex]\frac{du}{dx}[/tex] by use of the product rule.
 
good work arildno
 
I'd personally prefer to use a partial fractions method.

Let [tex]y = \frac{a}{x+2} + \frac{b}{x+3} + \frac{c}{x+4}[/tex]

Multiply throughout by [itex](x+2)(x+3)(x+4)[/itex], you get

[tex]x = a(x+3)(x+4) + b(x+2)(x+4) + c(x+2)(x+3)[/tex]

Substitute in turn [itex]x = -2, -3, -4[/itex] and almost immediately you get

[tex]a = -1, b = 3, c = -2[/tex]

giving [tex]y = \frac{-1}{x+2} + \frac{3}{x+3} + \frac{-2}{x+4}[/tex]

then

[tex]y' = \frac{1}{(x+2)^2} - \frac{3}{(x+3)^2} + \frac{2}{(x+4)^2}[/tex]

and I would be happy to leave it in that form.

EDIT : Doing it this way is optional for the derivative (arildno's method is fine here), but partial fractions are essential for integrating the function.
 
Last edited:
I recommend OP to pay close attention to Curious' excellent procedure.
While it may seem very cumbersome and unnecessary to do the partial fractions decomposition, learning that technique through following Curious' example is only to your later benefit.
Also, it brings to light that there are always more than one single correct way of doing maths.
Good work, Curious.
 
arildno said:
I recommend OP to pay close attention to Curious' excellent procedure.
While it may seem very cumbersome and unnecessary to do the partial fractions decomposition, learning that technique through following Curious' example is only to your later benefit.
Also, it brings to light that there are always more than one single correct way of doing maths.
Good work, Curious.

Thank you, arildno, for your very kind words. :smile:

It's completely true, you can never learn too many techniques in Math. Each new technique you learn is another invaluable tool you have in tackling a new problem.
 
In spirit of aildno's wise words, here's another method that gives you the derivative quickly, but doesn't look quite as beautiful as Curious' method.

It's logarithmic differentiation, take the logarithm of both sides:

[tex]\ln y = \ln x - \ln (x+2) -\ln (x+3) -\ln (x+4)[/tex]
then differentiate and use the chain rule:

[tex]\frac{dy}{dx}=y\left(\frac{1}{x}-\frac{1}{x+2}-\frac{1}{x+3}-\frac{1}{x+4}\right)=\frac{x}{(x+2)(x+3)(x+4)}\left(\frac{1}{x}-\frac{1}{x+2}-\frac{1}{x+3}-\frac{1}{x+4}\right)[/tex]

I`m not very fond of this method, but it serves its purpose. Points of worry might be the points where y is nonpositive, so you cannot take the logarithm. The method works just as well with the logarithm of the absolute value, so you can ignore that 'detail' when working out the problem. the only point remaining is where y=0, but that works out ok as well.
 
Last edited:
Shouldn't that be an (x + 4) in there? Bottom line, on the left side of the last = sign. It's probably just a typo.
 
Yes it was.
 
  • #10
It's interesting to see all the different methods and different (but equivalent) solutions that such a simple question can receive.

If I had received this question I'd probably have used the following simple (though none too elegant) method.

y=x / ( (x+2)(x+3)(x+4) )

Since the denominator is very easy to expand I'd write,

y= x / (x^3 + 9x^2 + 26x + 24) or y = x (x^3 + 9x^2 + 26x + 24)^(-1)

And then use either the quotient rule or the product and chain rule as per personal preference to eventually yield,

dy/dx = (-2x^3 - 9x^2 + 24) / ( (x+2)^2 (x+3)^2 (x+4)^2 )
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K