Why Are Diagonalized Matrix Columns the Eigenvectors?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter toffee
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the relationship between diagonalized matrices, their eigenvectors, and eigenvalues. Participants explore the properties of diagonal matrices and the implications of matrix diagonalization in the context of linear transformations and change of basis. The conversation includes theoretical aspects as well as conceptual clarifications regarding eigenvectors and eigenvalues.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why the columns of a diagonalized matrix correspond to its eigenvectors and why the eigenvalues are the diagonal elements.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of specifying which matrices are being discussed and introduces the relationship between the original matrix and its diagonalized form using the equation M = PDQ.
  • A third participant clarifies that the eigenvalues of a diagonal matrix are indeed the diagonal elements, referencing the characteristic equation.
  • Further explanation is provided regarding how linear transformations relate to basis vectors and how applying a transformation to these vectors results in the eigenvalues appearing on the diagonal of the matrix.
  • There is mention of the "change of basis" matrix, which contains the eigenvectors as columns and is used to transition between different bases in vector space.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying degrees of understanding regarding the relationship between diagonal matrices, eigenvectors, and eigenvalues. While some points are clarified, there remains uncertainty about the specifics of the matrices being discussed and the implications of the change of basis.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about the matrices and the definitions of terms like "change of basis." Some mathematical steps and relationships are not fully resolved, leaving room for further exploration.

toffee
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
why are the eigenvectors in a square matrix which is diagonalised (only has numbers in the M_jj elements), just each column of the matrix? And why are the eigenvalues the actual number in each column.

I can understand if its diagonal, the matrix consists of linearly indepednent therefore orthogal vectors. Are these necessarily the eigenvectors of the matrix?

Many thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Which of the many matrices you're alluding to but not mentioning are you talking about?

Let M be the original matrix, and let D be its diagonalized form, and let P and Q=P^{-1} be the matrix satisfying

M = PDQ, or D=QMP

When you refer to the rows/columns, you ought to be talking about those of Q/P, when it should be clear what's going on if you're ok with the notion of "change of basis".
 
It sounds like toffee is talking about the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of a diagonal matrix, D.

(that the eigenvalues are the diagonal elements themselves comes directly from the characteristic equation : [itex]det|D - \lambda I| = 0 => \Pi _{i=1}^N (D_{ii} - \lambda) = 0[/itex])
 
We write any linear transformation as a matrix by choosing a specific basis and seeing what the transformation does to the basis vectors. That is, if v1, v1, . . ., v1 is a basis, we can write any vector v= a1v1+ a1v1+ anv1 and write v as the "n-tuple" (a1, a2, . . ., an). Each basis vector is represented by (1, 0, ..., 0), (0, 1, . . ., 0), etc.
Applying the linear transformation to v1 is the same as multiplying the matrix times (1, 0, . . ., 0) which gives whatever the coefficients of that vector are.

Suppose T is a linear transformation, over vector space V, with eigenvalues &lambda1, &lambda2, . . ., &lambdan, having corresponding eigenvectors v1, v1, . . ., v1 which form a basis for V. Applying T to v1 ((represented as (1, 0, . . ., 0)) gives λ1: that would be written (&lamba;1, 0, . . ., 0) so the first column is simply that: (&lamba;1, 0, . . ., 0) . That's why the matrix is a diagonal matrix with the eigenvalues on the diagonal.
The "matrix with eigenvectors as columns" you are talking about is, I think, the "change of basis" matrix. If you have a linear transformation written as a matrix in a given basis and want to change to another basis, then you need to multiply by a "change of basis" matrix which is just the same as applying a linear transformation. It's columns are, again, just the result of applying the transformation to the basis vectors. In particular, the "change of basis" matrix from the basis of eigenvectors to your original take (1, 0,..., 0) to the first eigenvector (written in the orginal basis) and so has first column exactly what that eigenvector is.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K