Trouble with Simple Harmonic Motion

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of equilibrium in simple harmonic motion (SHM) and the conditions affecting acceleration at various points in the oscillation path. Participants are exploring the definitions and implications of equilibrium in the context of SHM.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the definition of equilibrium, particularly whether it refers to the absence of net force or a stationary state. They are also discussing the implications of restoring forces in SHM and how these relate to acceleration at different points in the motion.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering insights into the nature of equilibrium in SHM. Some have provided clarifications regarding the conditions under which equilibrium occurs, while others are still exploring the implications of these definitions. There is no explicit consensus yet on the interpretation of equilibrium.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the definitions of equilibrium and the role of restoring forces in SHM. There is an ongoing examination of how these concepts apply to the specific statements presented in the original question.

shawonna23
Messages
146
Reaction score
0
I am having trouble with this question:

1. A particle oscillating in simple harmonic motion is:

in equilibrium at the center of its path because the acceleration is zero there

or

in equilibrium at the ends of its path because the acceleration is zero there


2. When a body executes simple harmonic motion, its acceleration at the ends of its path must be: more than g

Is this statement correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
shawonna23 said:
I am having trouble with this question:

1. A particle oscillating in simple harmonic motion is:

in equilibrium at the center of its path because the acceleration is zero there

or

in equilibrium at the ends of its path because the acceleration is zero there
For SHM there must be a restoring force, pulling the object back to the center of its path. The greater the displacement from the center, the greater the force. (Consider a spring.) Use this information to determine which answer is correct.
2. When a body executes simple harmonic motion, its acceleration at the ends of its path must be: more than g

Is this statement correct?
No. The acceleration depends on the strength of the restoring force at the end of the path. It might be greater than g, but certainly doesn't have to be.
 
Thanks, the answers is:
in equilibrium at the center of its path
 
What is meant by "equilibrium"? If it means "no net force", that happens at the centre of the path. If it means "stationary", that happens at the ends.
 
James R said:
What is meant by "equilibrium"? If it means "no net force", that happens at the centre of the path. If it means "stationary", that happens at the ends.

Equilibrium means that if you placed an object in a certain postion, the net force acting on that particle is zero and it would remain at rest. This is not the case at the ends. If you place the object there, the spring will always pull it back toward the point of zero force.

Equilibrium can be stable or unstable. It is stable if a small displacement results in an unbalanced force that tends to pull it back. It is unstable if a small displacement results in a force that tends to push it farther away, like trying to balance a pencil in its point.
 
Basically equilibrium does not take place in SHM.But Net force is zero at the centre but not at the two ends.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K