Solving Stokes' Theorem: Find \int_{\partial S} F \cdot ds

  • Thread starter Thread starter mkkrnfoo85
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stokes Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on applying Stokes' Theorem to the integral \(\int \int_S ( \nabla \times F) \cdot dS\) for the closed surface defined by the ellipsoid \(x^2+y^2+2z^2=10\) and the vector field \(F=(\sin(xy), e^x, -yz)\). It is established that the boundary \(\partial S\) of the ellipsoid is empty, leading to the conclusion that \(\int_{\partial S} F \cdot ds = 0\). The conditions under which Stokes' Theorem applies are clarified, emphasizing that it is valid for closed surfaces without boundaries, confirming that the integral evaluates to zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Stokes' Theorem
  • Familiarity with vector calculus
  • Knowledge of surface integrals
  • Concept of closed surfaces in three-dimensional space
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Stokes' Theorem in various geometrical contexts
  • Explore examples of closed surfaces such as spheres and cylinders
  • Learn about the divergence theorem and its relationship with Stokes' Theorem
  • Investigate the properties of vector fields and their curl
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone studying vector calculus or applying Stokes' Theorem in theoretical or practical scenarios.

mkkrnfoo85
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Here is the problem:

S is the ellipsoid [tex]x^2+y^2+2z^2=10[/tex]

and F is a vector field [tex]F=(sin(xy),e^x,-yz)[/tex]

Find: [tex]\int \int_S ( \nabla \mbox {x} F) \cdot dS[/tex]


So, I know that Stokes' Theorem states that:
[tex]\int \int_S ( \nabla \mbox {x} F) \cdot dS = \int_{\partial S} F \cdot ds[/tex]
where [tex]\partial S[/tex] equals the boundary of the ellipsoid. How do you find [tex]\partial S[/tex]? My professor just told me that any closed surface has no boundary and therefore the answer is 0, but would someone show me how I can show this? And can someone tell me under what conditions does the answer become 0 using Stokes' Theorem? Thanks a lot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Stokes' theorem is derived by dividing a bounded surface up into a bunch of small flat surfaces and then noticing that the line integrals around all these surfaces cancel each other out except at the boundary of the big surface. Think about that and what it means if the surface you're splitting up has no boundary.
 


To solve this problem, we can start by finding the boundary of the ellipsoid \partial S. The boundary of a surface is defined as the set of points where the surface ends or meets another surface. In this case, the ellipsoid is a closed surface, meaning it has no boundaries. This can be seen by visualizing the ellipsoid and noticing that it has no edges or boundaries where it meets another surface. Therefore, \partial S = \emptyset and the integral becomes:

\int \int_S ( \nabla \mbox {x} F) \cdot dS = \int_{\emptyset} F \cdot ds = 0

This shows that the answer is indeed 0, as your professor stated.

Stokes' Theorem is applicable when the surface is closed, meaning it has no boundaries or edges. In this case, the surface is a closed ellipsoid and therefore the theorem can be used. In general, Stokes' Theorem can be used for any closed surface, whether it is a sphere, cylinder, or any other shape with no boundaries.

In summary, to solve this problem we first determine that the boundary of the ellipsoid is \emptyset. Then, using Stokes' Theorem, we can rewrite the integral as \int_{\emptyset} F \cdot ds = 0. This shows that the answer is 0 and also shows the conditions under which Stokes' Theorem can be used - for closed surfaces with no boundaries.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K