Square Packing Solutions for 24 Integer Squares

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical properties of square packing solutions for integer squares, specifically focusing on the integer nature of the sums of squares and the feasibility of arranging squares with sides from 1 to 24 into a larger square of side 70. The conversation includes theoretical exploration, mathematical reasoning, and some conjectures regarding integer solutions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that only for n = 1 or n = 24, the quantity A_n is an integer, but proof for other n remains unverified.
  • One participant presents a formula for A_n and confirms that A_{24} results in an integer, yet questions whether other integer values for A_n exist.
  • A participant references historical mathematical literature that may contain proofs related to the integer nature of square and pyramidal numbers.
  • Another participant mentions the cannonball problem and its connection to a Diophantine equation, suggesting that only specific numbers are both square and pyramidal.
  • There is a discussion about the B_n sequence and its infinite integer solutions, with a correction made regarding the formula used.
  • Several participants express skepticism about the possibility of fitting squares of sides 1 to 24 into a larger square of side 70, citing difficulties in arrangement.
  • One participant claims that while fitting squares from 1 to 24 into a square of side 70 seems unlikely, it is possible to fit them into a square with side 175.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the integer nature of A_n for values other than 1 and 24, and there is no consensus on the feasibility of packing squares into a larger square of side 70. The discussion remains unresolved regarding both the existence of other integer solutions and the packing arrangement.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of a definitive proof for the integer nature of A_n for n other than 1 and 24, and the unresolved mathematical steps in the exploration of packing squares.

AntonVrba
Messages
92
Reaction score
0
[tex] \begin{array}{c}<br /> {{A_n}={\sqrt{\sum _{z=1}^{n}{z^2}}} } \\<br /> {{A_1}=1 } \\<br /> {{A_{24}}=70}\end{array}\[/tex]

Is there a proof that only for n =1 or n=24 that An is an integer quantity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
[tex]A_n=\sqrt{\frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}}[/tex], and for n=24 you have 24/6 * 25 * 49.
 
CRGreathouse said:
[tex]A_n=\sqrt{\frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}}[/tex], and for n=24 you have 24/6 * 25 * 49.

OK that is 4*25*49 all being squares proves [tex]A_{24}=2*5*7[/tex] and confirms what I have already said but that is no proof that another n could or does not exist such that [tex]A_n[/tex] is a integer quantity.
 
Last edited:
I think there is a proof. I would check Dickson's History of the Theory of Numbers, if you are near a library that has it.
 
I got the answer:

The only numbers that are simultaneously square and pyramidal (the cannonball problem) are 1 and 4900, ...(Dickson 1952, p. 25; Ball and Coxeter 1987, p. 59; Ogilvy 1988), as conjectured by Lucas (1875, 1876) and proved by Watson (1918). The cannonball problem is equivalent to solving the Diophantine equation:

[tex]y^2 = \frac{(x)(x+1)(2x+1)}{6}[/tex]

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SquareNumber.html
 
Last edited:
Robert - thanks but is the fact that finding just one solution proof? it is just one answer. I have to find Watson's proof.

Interesting to note is that

[tex]\begin{array}{c}{{B_n}={\sqrt{\sum_{y=1}^{n}{\sum _{z=1}^{y}{z^2}}}}=\sqrt{\frac{n(n+1)^2(2n+1)}{6}} } \\{{B_1}=1 } \\{{B_{6}}=14\\{{B_{25}}=95}\\{etc}\\{B_{19785515999613069781581367686}=113006685964487096197915421007515390839216297500491081054\end{array}\[/tex]

or solving the Diophantine equation

[tex]y^2 = \frac{(x)(x+1)^2(2x+1)}{6}[/tex]

has infinite number of integer solutions (the above shows the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 50th solution) and are easy to generate numerically
 
Last edited:
AntonVrba said:
Interesting to note is that

[tex]\begin{array}{c}{{B_n}={\sqrt{\sum_{y=1}^{n}{\sum _{z=1}^{y}{z^2}}}}=\sqrt{\frac{n(n+1)^2(2n+1)}{6}} } \\{{B_1}=1 } \\{{B_{6}}=14\\{{B_{25}}=95}\\{etc}\\{B_{19785515999613069781581367686}=113006685964487096197915421007515390839216297500491081054\end{array}\[/tex]

or solving the Diophantine equation

[tex]y^2 = \frac{(x)(x+1)^2(2x+1)}{6}[/tex]

has infinite number of integer solutions (the above shows the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 50th solution) and are easy to generate numerically

Sorry I made a mistake:
[tex]{{B_n}={\sqrt{\sum_{y=1}^{n}{\sum _{z=1}^{y}{z^2}}}}=\sqrt{\frac{n(n+1)^2(n+2)}{12}} }[/tex]

[tex]y^2 = \frac{(x)(x+1)^2(x+2)}{12}[/tex]

The one factor is (n+2) and not (2n+1) and the divisor is 12 not 6

Careless cut and paste on my part
 
Last edited:
This has got me thinking. Is it possible to to put together squares with sides 1 to 24 to make a square of side 70. It looks unlikely as it is difficult to see how the small squares would fit in - for instance the 1 square has to be surrounded by larger squares. I wondered whether anyone has any more information on fitting squares together in this way.
 
chronon said:
This has got me thinking. Is it possible to to put together squares with sides 1 to 24 to make a square of side 70. It looks unlikely as it is difficult to see how the small squares would fit in - for instance the 1 square has to be surrounded by larger squares. I wondered whether anyone has any more information on fitting squares together in this way.

I doubt if you can fit 1 to 24 in a 70 square, very unlikely

but 24 different integers squares can be packed into a square with 175 sides, solution in the attched file
 

Attachments

  • 24sqares2.gif
    24sqares2.gif
    10 KB · Views: 861

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K