Calculate Energy Running: M x V^2

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter horazio
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Running
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the energy expenditure of a person running, specifically focusing on the relationship between weight, speed, and energy in calories. Participants explore various methods and considerations for estimating energy use in running, touching on both theoretical and practical aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a formula for calculating energy based on kinetic energy, suggesting that energy can be derived from the change in velocity.
  • Another participant challenges this approach, noting that a runner can burn calories at a constant speed despite no change in kinetic energy, indicating a flaw in the initial calculation.
  • A different viewpoint highlights the complexity of energy calculations in running, suggesting that vertical movement during running steps complicates the assessment of energy expenditure.
  • One participant recommends correlating energy expenditure with oxygen intake for a more accurate assessment, suggesting a shift towards a work/power approach instead of purely energy calculations.
  • It is mentioned that running typically burns between 50-200 calories per mile, influenced by weight and speed.
  • Another participant notes that much of the energy burned during running is wasted due to the inefficiency of the human body.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the best method to calculate energy expenditure while running, with no consensus reached on a single approach. Some emphasize the importance of considering factors beyond simple kinetic energy calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in the initial energy calculation approach, including the neglect of factors like constant speed and vertical movement. There is also mention of the inefficiency of the human body in energy expenditure calculations.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying exercise physiology, biomechanics, or anyone looking to understand the complexities of energy expenditure in physical activities like running.

horazio
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello
I was trying to calculate the energy in calories used by a man of weight M running at speed V. What would be the fastest way to calculate this?
E = 1/2 (Vf^2) x M - 1/2 (Vi^2) x M

(with Vf = final velocity and Vi = initial velocity )

Oh by the way I designed a simple program for Windows XP about http://www.freewebs.com/horazio/vcl.zip,
it's very simple but it's also useful for those who study physics. check it out

http://www.freewebs.com/horazio/freeware.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It doesn't make any sense.A man may be running at constant speed (no KE variation),but he'd be burning calories like crazy...

Daniel.
 
Running is very tricky to calculate energy for because it's not perfectly linear. By linear I mean that you don't just travel straight while running. If you think of each running step as a jump at some angle from the horizontal, you can see that there will be a component in the vertical direction. This component would almost certainly depend on the runner and how fast that particular runner was going.
 
If you are going to do it properly, the pros have a way to correlate energy expense as a function of oxygen intake. Since you're not going to do that, you should probably look into work/power instead of energy approach. You probably won't be anywhere in thae ballpark, but it will make more sense than the energy approach.
 
running (or walking) uses about 50-200 calories per mile depending on your weight, and (to a lesser extent) your speed.
 
And, in any case, almost all of the calories burned will go "waste" energy because your body is a remarkably inefficient machine.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
766
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 138 ·
5
Replies
138
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K