Solving Integral Problems: Limits and Double Integrals

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mansi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving integral problems involving limits and double integrals, specifically focusing on the integrals of functions involving trigonometric and exponential terms. Participants explore theoretical approaches and computational techniques related to these integrals.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about their theoretical foundation for solving the integrals presented.
  • There is a clarification on the notation of the sine function raised to a power, with some participants discussing the implications of different notations.
  • Another participant proposes a specific form for the integral of the first function and suggests evaluating its limit as k approaches infinity.
  • Some participants provide specific computed values for the integral at different k values, while others express skepticism about the solvability of the first integral.
  • One participant discusses the behavior of the sine function as k increases and suggests that the limit approaches zero for the integral.
  • There is a debate over the notation used for the sine function raised to a power, with participants discussing the potential for confusion and the implications of different interpretations.
  • Participants also explore the meaning of sine raised to the power of zero and negative integers, leading to further discussion about notation and its consistency.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the solvability of the integrals or the implications of the different notations for the sine function. Multiple competing views and interpretations remain present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the first integral may be unsolvable, while others suggest that bounds or limits could provide sufficient information. The discussion includes various assumptions about the behavior of functions as parameters change, but these assumptions are not universally accepted.

mansi
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
i think i don't have adequate theory to solve these problems... :frown:

1.given that f(x) =cos(x) sin^k(x) / (1+x). calculate integral of this function wrt x between limits 0 and pi/2 . then find the it's limit as k tends to infinity...

2.let f(x)={e^(-ax)-e^(-bx)}/x, 0< a< b .let I be the integral of f wrt x between 0 and infinity. express I as a double integral...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) Are you meaning : [tex]\sin^k(x)\textrm{ or }\sin(x)^k[/tex] ?
 
the former...
 
Do you have to compute these 2

[tex]F(k)=:\int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\left[\cos x\left(\frac{\sin^{k}x}{1+x}\right)\right] dx[/tex]

[tex]\lim_{k\rightarrow +\infty} F(k)[/tex]

...?

Daniel.
 
Here's the answer for

[tex]F(1)=\frac {1}{2}\mbox{Si}\left( 2+\pi \right) \cos 2-\frac {1}{2}\mbox{Ci}\left( 2+\pi \right) \sin 2-\frac {1}{2}\mbox{Si}\left( 2\right) \cos 2+ \frac {1}{2}\mbox{Ci}\left( 2\right) \sin 2[/tex]

[tex]F(2)= -\frac{1}{4}\mbox{Si}\left( \frac {3}{2}\pi +3\right) \sin 3-\frac{1}{4}\mbox{Ci}\left( \frac {3}{2}\pi +3\right) \cos 3+\frac{1}{4}\mbox{Si}\left( 1+\frac{1}{2}\pi \right) \sin 1[/tex]
[tex]+\frac{1}{4}\mbox{Ci}\left( 1+\frac{1}{2}\pi \right) \cos 1+\frac{1}{4}\mbox{Si}\left( 3\right) \sin 3+\frac{1}{4}\mbox{Ci}\left( 3\right) \cos 3-\frac{1}{4}\mbox{Si}\left( 1\right) \sin 1-\frac{1}{4}\mbox{Ci}\left( 1\right) \cos 1[/tex]

Daniel.
 
Last edited:
Here you can compute other values of F.I computed [itex]F(78)[/itex].

http://www.hostsrv.com/webmab/app1/MSP/quickmath/02/pageGenerate?site=quickmath&s1=calculus&s2=integrate&s3=advanced#reply

Daniel.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well the first is really unsolvable I think...even the latter is hard...maybe a start like this :

[tex]\frac{sin(x)^kcos(x)}{1+x}=\left(\frac{e^{ix}-e^{-ix}}{2i}\right)^k\frac{e^{ix}+e^{-ix}}{2}\frac{1}{1+x}[/tex]

[tex]= \frac{1}{2^{k+1}i^k}\sum_{n=0}^k\left(\begin{array}{c} k\\n\end{array}\right)(-1)^{n-k}\frac{e^{i(2n-k+1)x}}{1+x}+\frac{e^{i(2n-k-1)x}}{1+x}[/tex]

Remain to calculate things of the form [tex]\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\frac{e^{imx}}{1+x}=\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}}e^{imx}\sum_{p=0}^\infty(-1)^p x^p[/tex]


...well no sorry, i get lost and wrong, maybe some contour integral with residues in the complex plane...or a recursion relation over k
 
I linked you to a website which uses WebMathematica.I used my own antique Maple to come up with this (see attached file).

I can only assume that the limit is 0...

Daniel.
 
Last edited:
1. Do you need to find the integral exactly? A bound will suffice if it's just the limit you're interested in, 1/(1+x) is bounded by 1 on [0..pi/2], cos and sin are non-negative there.
 
  • #10
I've messed about in mathematica and got that:

[tex]\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{\cos x \sin^{1000000000} x}{1 + x} dx = 0 \quad \text{(to 100 dp)}[/tex]

Also if you look at the graph of the function as you increase k for either the whole function or just sink (x) it starts to look like the area does tend towards 0.

Perhaps this is about looking at the properties of the function, it would seem that:

[tex]\lim_{k \rightarrow \infty} \sin^k x = \left\{ \begin{array}{rcl} <br /> 1 & \mbox{for} & x = \pi \left(2n + \frac{1}{2} \right) \quad n \in \mathbb{Z}\\ <br /> \text{Undefined} & \mbox{for} & x = \pi \left(2n - \frac{1}{2} \right) \quad n \in \mathbb{Z} \\ <br /> 0 & \mbox{for} & \text{elsewhere} <br /> \end{array}\right. [/tex]

Now using that to look at the original function it's fairly easy to derive that:

[tex]\lim_{k \rightarrow \infty} \frac{\cos x \sin^{k} x}{1 + x} = 0 \quad \forall x \in \left[0,\frac{\pi}{2}\right][/tex]

Suddenly looks a lot easier to integrate to me o:)
 
Last edited:
  • #11
thanks for the help...
never mind the second one...i figured it out.
 
  • #12
Do you know why we always write sin(x)^k=sin^k(x) ?

This seems to me a notation abuse. Let's take k positive integer, then

sin(x)^k=sin(x)*sin(x)*...sin(x) k times

sin^k(x)=sin(sin(...sin(x)))...)) k times iterated

Or you have another notation for iteration n-times ?
 
  • #13
sin^k(x)=(sinx)^k =sinx *sinx*...k times
and to express the second one let f(x)=sinx
then f^k(x)= (sin(sin(...sin(x)))...))
 
  • #14
Actually it's not to confuse [itex]\sin (x^k)[/itex] with [itex](\sin x)^k[/itex] as most people don't bother writing out the brackets.

But yeah notations don't seem to be entirely generalized.
 
  • #15
klein, I've never seen the sin function self-iterated like you demonstrated,

[tex]sin^k(x) = sin(x)^k[/tex]

The one on the RHS isn't used because of this one,
and they arent equalto [tex]sin(x^k)[/tex]
 
  • #16
Actually the argument of [itex]\sin x[/itex] is never paranthesized,unless it gets really complicated...There's no point in writing [itex]\sin\left(x\right)[/itex],but it is for [itex]\sin\left(x+y\right)[/itex].

Daniel.
 
  • #17
dextercioby said:
Actually the argument of [itex]\sin x[/itex] is never paranthesized,unless it gets really complicated...There's no point in writing [itex]\sin\left(x\right)[/itex],but it is for [itex]\sin\left(x+y\right)[/itex].

Daniel.
But that's my point, can you see the difference between:

[tex]\sin {x^k}[/tex]

And:

[tex]{\sin x}^k[/tex]

Unless you look at the code?
 
  • #18
I didn't look.Did u use "\displaystyle" ...?

Daniel.

EDIT:No,you didn't. :-p I'm not trying to impose my own beliefs,just to stress out that writing

[tex]\sin x^{k}\neq \left(\sin x\right)^{k}\equiv \sin^{k} x[/tex]

has a motivation.If someone else sees it and agrees on it,then I'm happy...
 
Last edited:
  • #19
But it does bother me that [tex]\sin^2{x}=(\sin{x})^2[/tex] but [tex]\sin^{-1}{x}\neq \frac{1}{\sin{x}}[/tex]! Why use the same notation for these two concepts? Why does the k in sin^k(x) represent a functional power if k=-1, but not for any other k? Bah!
 
  • #20
Wonder what [itex]sin^{-2}x[/itex] would translate as?
 
  • #21
whozum said:
Wonder what [itex]sin^{-2}x[/itex] would translate as?
[tex]sin^{-2}x = \frac{1}{(\sin x)^2}[/tex]

The notation may be odd but it's fairly common and well known.
 
  • #22
Hmm... on that note, what do you think [tex]\sin^0{x}[/tex] is? 1 or x? I vote for 1.
 
  • #23
Well technically only [itex]sin^{-1}x[/itex] is the arcsin function, so how about

[tex]sin^{(-1)(0)}x[/tex]

[tex]arcsin(x)^0 \ or \ 1^{-1}[/tex]
 
  • #24
Moo Of Doom said:
Hmm... on that note, what do you think [tex]\sin^0{x}[/tex] is? 1 or x? I vote for 1.
You'd be right, apart from when [itex]x = k\pi \quad k \in \mathbb{Z}[/itex]. Look it's really simple in general:

[tex]\sin^a x = \left\{ \begin{array}{rcl} <br /> \arcsin x & \mbox{for} & x = -1\\ <br /> (\sin x)^a & \mbox{for} & \text{elsewhere} \\ <br /> \end{array}\right. [/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K