What do you think of UofT's EngSci Program?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Athalus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Program
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The University of Toronto's Engineering Science (EngSci) program is known for its rigorous academic standards, with many students experiencing a significant drop in grades compared to high school. Approximately two-thirds of students leave the program by the end of the second year, often due to the challenging curriculum and workload. While some students thrive, achieving high averages, others struggle, particularly in courses like philosophy. The program is particularly suited for those interested in nanoengineering, but prospective students should weigh their personal interests and the financial implications of tuition before enrolling.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of university-level mathematics and physics
  • Familiarity with engineering principles and concepts
  • Knowledge of the Ontario Academic Credit (OAC) system
  • Awareness of the financial aspects of higher education
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the curriculum and course offerings of UofT's Engineering Science program
  • Explore alternative universities with strong Nanoengineering programs
  • Investigate student support services and networking opportunities within engineering faculties
  • Examine financial aid options and scholarships available for engineering students
USEFUL FOR

Prospective engineering students, academic advisors, and individuals considering a career in engineering or nanoengineering will benefit from this discussion.

Athalus
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Just wondering what was the general opinion of UofT's Engineering Science program, if there is any? Also I was wondering which other universities offer a Nanoengineering program?

Cheers
Athalus
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I took first year EngSci at U of T last year (that is, 2003-04). I came from a pretty good high school, where I graduated with a 93% average. I finished first year Eng Sci with an 89.5% average, pulled down largely by "philosophy" because the philosophy course was... odd. On the other hand, most people I know came in with a 95% and ended up between 60 and low 70's. Many people failed or left (by the second year, I think 2/3 left, 1/3 of the total leaving by first semester's end). It is indeed possible to do very well in Eng. Sci., even with ease, but the chances are low, and you'd probably need a good idea of how your high school stood in relation to others in order to make a reasonable prediction (important if you are apprehensive about taking a program that you might struggles with, but not if you're expecting a challenge). So taking the statistics into consideration, the difficulty of the program will be a factor you may need to consider (it certainly turned out to be for some people I knew).

I just finished my second year of university, but I was in a math program for the last year. I switched out of Eng. Sci. after the first year. This is because 1) I wasn't looking forward to PEY, in fact, I had no real desire to work as an engineer, 2) I wasn't enjoying chemistry, labs, technical things and was mostly interested in math and physics, and some philosophy. Switching over to Arts and Science allowed me to do this, so I have a program much better suited to what I want to learn. The challenge is still comparable, in that it is not a difficult challenge (as OAC was) but it still requires decent effort and keeps you learning. However I think the workload is a little lighter. So you have to take what you're interested into consideration. Of course, if you're interested most in nanoengineering, then Eng Sci is right up your alley.

I think if you live on campus near the engineering buildings, you can get a decent group of people in your program to network with, which makes a number of things easy, so I would recommend that to you. Generally, I think it's a decent program, but the above, plus perhaps money (it's one of the more expensive programs, on the other hand I earned enough in awards to pay for a years worth of arts and science tuition and books), are things you should consider before deciding.

EDIT: You shouldn't only get one opinion. I know that when I was in Eng Sci, I got some (not as many as I could have) opinions, but even the few that I got were quite helpful. Although I only have my opinion, I think I can tell you that the typical, average opinion would be that you need to work harder than you did in high school, and expect to get a slightly lower mark than in high school. It would also be typical to find that people (at least those who stay, and even some that leave) found the program reasonably enjoyable.
 
Last edited:
Ah i remember applying to engsci...i was borderlin and when i got my admissions interview call, i was halfasleep...i heard its pretty decent but a lot of my buddies dropped out because they couldnt' take it
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
7K
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K