How Do Mechanics and Statics Problems Calculate Movement and Force?

  • Thread starter Thread starter blackbody
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around mechanics and statics problems involving forces, movement, and equilibrium. The original poster presents two distinct problems: one involving a mass-spring system with friction and another concerning a uniform beam supported by wedges with additional weights. The focus is on understanding the relationships between forces and motion in these contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply Newton's laws and the work-energy theorem to analyze the mechanics of a mass-spring system and the forces acting on a beam in static equilibrium. They question the assumptions regarding accelerations and energy states in both problems.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided suggestions for using work-energy relationships in the first problem, while others have pointed out potential errors in the original poster's equations for the statics problem. There is an ongoing exploration of the relationships between the weights and distances in the statics scenario, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes the presence of friction in the first problem and the need for stability conditions in the second problem. There are indications of confusion regarding the setup and calculations in both scenarios, particularly concerning the forces and torques involved.

blackbody
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I just want to verify that my thought process for these problems is valid, any help would be appreciated. (I have pictures attached for each problem for clarity)

1) You have mass1 attached to a spring with a certain spring constant k, it rests on a tabletop with a force of friction with a coefficient [tex]\mu[/tex]. Attached to mass1 is an ideal cord that extends over the table over an ideal pulley which holds mass2. a) If the spring is compressed a certain amount, and then released (spring stretches an amount x, smaller than max displacement), how far does mass2 move down? b) How much energy is dissipated by friction?

a) Ok, so I set my coordinate system as positive for mass1 to the right, and for mass2 positive is down. I'm assuming the accelerations for both blocks is equal?

For mass1 [tex]= \sum F_x = kx + F_T - \mu m_1g = m_1a[/tex]

For mass2[tex]= \sum F_y = m_2g - F_T = m_2a[/tex]

So I solve for a in both equations, set them equal to each other, and I get:

[tex]F_T = \frac{m_2(m_1g + \mu m_1g - kx)}{m_1 + m_2}[/tex]

[tex]a = m_2(g - m_1g + \mu m_1g - kx)[/tex]

Ok, times to stop for [tex]m_1[/tex] and [tex]m_2[/tex] are equal, but I don't know where to go from here.

b) I think I'm supposed to use the work energy theorem to figure out how much energy was dissipated by friction...but are the initial kinetic and potential energies of the system 0?

2) STATICS problem:
You have a uniform beam of length (l), mass M, supported by two wedges, Q and P. There are two boxes, W1 and W2 on top of the beam; each box has a different distance from the center of mass of the beam. a) What masses of W1 and W2 is the system stable? b) At which configuration does the normal force at Q goes to zero?

Ok, the second picture attached should help on the setup of the problem.

My solution:
Ok, so I need the [tex]\sum \tau[/tex] around P to = 0, as well as the net force:

(counter-clockwise positive)
[tex]\sum \tau = W_1 A + Mg B - W_2 C - F_Q D = 0[/tex]

[tex]\sum F = F_Q + F_P - W_1 - W_2 - Mg = 0[/tex]

This is where I get stuck, and I'm not even sure these are right. Thanks for the help!
 

Attachments

  • problem.gif
    problem.gif
    2.2 KB · Views: 557
  • problem2.gif
    problem2.gif
    1 KB · Views: 582
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In question 1:
a) I would rather suggest the use of work-energy relationships. There is work done by a non-conservative force (friction) which is equal to the difference in mechanical energy of the system.

[tex]W_{nc} = \Delta ME = \Delta (KE + GPE + EPE)[/tex],

where,

[tex]KE = \frac{1}{2}mv^2[/tex],

[tex]GPE = mgh[/tex],

[tex]EPE = \frac{1}{2}kx^2[/tex].

Denoting by s the displacement, then we setup the equation:

[tex]-\mu m_1gs = (0 + m_2gs + \frac{1}{2}kx^2) - (0 + 0 + 0)[/tex]

Simplify this and solve for s.

b) If you found s you can also determine

[tex]W_f = -\mu mgs[/tex]
 
Thanks, that helped, and ideas for problem 2?
 
blackbody said:
Thanks, that helped, and ideas for problem 2?
blackbody said:
2) STATICS problem:
You have a uniform beam of length (l), mass M, supported by two wedges, Q and P. There are two boxes, W1 and W2 on top of the beam; each box has a different distance from the center of mass of the beam. a) What masses of W1 and W2 is the system stable? b) At which configuration does the normal force at Q goes to zero?

Ok, the second picture attached should help on the setup of the problem.

My solution:
Ok, so I need the [tex]\sum \tau[/tex] around P to = 0, as well as the net force:

(counter-clockwise positive)
[tex]\sum \tau = W_1 A + Mg B - W_2 C - F_Q D = 0[/tex]

[tex]\sum F = F_Q + F_P - W_1 - W_2 - Mg = 0[/tex]

This is where I get stuck, and I'm not even sure these are right. Thanks for the help!

[tex]\sum \tau = W_1 A + Mg B - W_2 C - F_Q D = 0[/tex]

Two of your distances in this equation are incorrect. All distances must be measured from the same rotation axis. Your other equation is OK. Stability can be achieved for many different values of W1 and W2, but there will be a relatioship between them. The normal force at Q will go to zero when W2 is sufficiently heavier than W1. At that condition, one term in both your equations will drop out
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K