Quick math probability question

  • Thread starter Thread starter seiferseph
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around conditional probability involving the outcomes of flipping an unbiased coin twice. Participants explore the probabilities of specific outcomes given certain conditions about the results of the flips.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants examine the relationship between different conditional probability questions, questioning whether the phrasing affects the interpretation of the problem. They discuss the implications of eliminating certain outcomes based on given conditions.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the nuances in phrasing and assumptions in probability questions. Some participants provide guidance on interpreting the conditions correctly, while others reflect on their understanding and the potential for misinterpretation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of specifying terms like "at least" or "exactly" in probability questions, as these can significantly alter the interpretation and the resulting calculations.

seiferseph
Messages
102
Reaction score
0
An unbiased coin is flipped twice. What is the probability that the second one is heads, given the first was a head?

also, is this the same question

An unbiased coin is flipped twice. What is the probability that they are both heads, given the first was a head?

i get 1/2, but I'm not sure if that is correct, thanks for any help!

thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sure, it is the same question, and yes, the answer is 1/2.

This is an exercise in conditional probability, so you ought to solve it by means of that (I hope that's what you did).
 
arildno said:
Sure, it is the same question, and yes, the answer is 1/2.

This is an exercise in conditional probability, so you ought to solve it by means of that (I hope that's what you did).

ok, let me confirm how i did it

sample space is (HH, HT, TH, TT). because the first one was heads, TH and TT are eliminated, so the probability of getting a head is just HH out of HH and HT, so 1/2. correctly done?
 
Sure, that elimination is what "conditional probability" effects.
 
arildno said:
Sure, that elimination is what "conditional probability" effects.


ok thank you, now another very similar problem

An unbiased coin is flipped twice. What is the probability that they are both heads, given one of them was a head?

this eliminates only TT, so would the probability be 1/3 ?
 
Careful now!
Wouldn't you say that your answer is the answer to the question:
"An unbiased coin is flipped twice. What is the probability that they are both heads, given that AT LEAST one of them was a head?"
 
arildno said:
Careful now!
Wouldn't you say that your answer is the answer to the question:
"An unbiased coin is flipped twice. What is the probability that they are both heads, given that AT LEAST one of them was a head?"

yeah, then what is the answer to
An unbiased coin is flipped twice. What is the probability that they are both heads, given one of them was a head?

what is the difference?
 
Erm, that was stupid of me. You were right..
 
arildno said:
Erm, that was stupid of me. You were right..

actually you're right, i don't think what i posted was ever printed in a question. they all use "AT LEAST". thanks for the help
 
  • #10
I think arildno made a good point. Unless you specify "at least", "at most", or "exactly", I think it's customary to assume "exactly". Better safe than sorry :)
 
  • #11
"exactly" would be a bad assumption. The question would then read, "what is the probability that there are two heads given that there is exactly one head?"
 
  • #12
AKG said:
"exactly" would be a bad assumption. The question would then read, "what is the probability that there are two heads given that there is exactly one head?"
This is why I found my objection dumb.
It is a meaningful question whose answer should be 0, but that wasn't what I had in mind when I posted by dumb objection..
 
  • #13
AKG said:
"exactly" would be a bad assumption. The question would then read, "what is the probability that there are two heads given that there is exactly one head?"
Right, not really worth asking, but "at most" isn't so far-fetched. I was just saying it wasn't a dumb thing to point out (and I would imagine a rather automatic response in a mathematician or scientist) even if it's quite certain in this case what was meant. It's still better to not need to make an assumption.
 
  • #14
honestrosewater said:
Right, not really worth asking, but "at most" isn't so far-fetched. I was just saying it wasn't a dumb thing to point out (and I would imagine a rather automatic response in a mathematician or scientist) even if it's quite certain in this case what was meant. It's still better to not need to make an assumption.
Agreed; it was more of an automatic response from ingrained habit than the result of deep thinking; but perhaps it is best to develop some such habits after all..
 
  • #15
Actually, AKG's right, I should have said it's customary to assume "exactly" unless the context suggests otherwise. Just think of how many times you mean "exactly" but don't state it compared to how many times you mean "at least" or "at most" but don't state it. But okay, I'll shut up about it now. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
7K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K