Collisions- Simple Algebra Problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around solving a collision problem involving two blocks with different masses, where block 1 (mass m1) collides elastically with block 2 (mass m2) at rest. The user initially applies the conservation of momentum and kinetic energy principles but struggles with isolating the final speed uf of block 1. A participant clarifies the momentum equation and suggests substituting the expression for vf into the kinetic energy equation to simplify the problem. The user ultimately confirms their understanding and expresses gratitude for the assistance received.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of elastic collisions in physics
  • Familiarity with the conservation of momentum
  • Knowledge of the conservation of kinetic energy
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of elastic and inelastic collisions in detail
  • Learn how to derive equations for final velocities in two-body collisions
  • Practice problems involving conservation laws in physics
  • Explore advanced topics such as momentum transfer and energy dissipation in collisions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators looking for examples of collision problems and their solutions.

verd
Messages
144
Reaction score
0
Collisions-- Simple Algebra Problem...

Hi,

So... I think I'm having a simple algebra problem-- I was just wondering if someone could point out my error. This is the problem:

Block 1, of mass [tex]m_{1}[/tex], moves across a frictionless surface with speed [tex]u_{i}[/tex]. It collides elastically with block 2, of mass [tex]m_{2}[/tex], which is at rest ([tex]v_{i}=0[/tex]). After the collision, block 1 moves with speed [tex]u_{f}[/tex], while block 2 moves with speed [tex]v_{f}[/tex]. Assume that [tex]m_{1} > m_{2}[/tex], so that after the collision, the two objects move off in the direction of the first object before the collision.

[Image]

What is the final speed [tex]u_{f}[/tex] of block 1?


So-- I find [tex]m_{2}v_{f}[/tex] using the law of conservation of momentum:
[tex]m_{2}v_{f} =m_{1}u_{i}-m_{1}u_{f}[/tex]

And I find [tex]m_{2}v_{f}^2[/tex] using the law of conservation of kinetic energy:
[tex]m_{2}v_{f}^2 = m_{1}(u_{i} - u_{f})(u_{i} + u_{f}).[/tex]

Then I find [tex]v_{f}[/tex] using only [tex]u_{i}[/tex], and [tex]u_{f}[/tex]:
[tex]v_{f} =\displaystyle{\frac{-(u_{i}+u_{f})-(u_{i}+u_{f})}{-2}}[/tex]


Now, I have to substitute what I just found for [tex]v_{f}[/tex] into the conservation of momentum formula, and solve for [tex]u_{f}[/tex]. ...But I guess I'm having difficulty singling out the [tex]u_{f}[/tex].

This is what I've got:

[tex]m_{1}u_{1} = m_{1}u_{f} + m_{2}(\displaystyle{\frac{-(u_{i}+u_{f})-(u_{i}+u_{f})}{-2}})[/tex]
...And here, I think I messed my algebra up, but when I simplify that, I get:
[tex]m_{1}u_{1} = m_{2}(u_{f} + u_{i}) + m_{1}u_{f}[/tex]

Is that right? ...If not/if so, how do I get the [tex]u_{f}[/tex] on just one side?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
verd said:
So-- I find [tex]m_{2}v_{f}[/tex] using the law of conservation of momentum:
[tex]m_{2}v_{f} =m_{1}u_{i}-m_{1}u_{f}[/tex]
OK.

And I find [tex]m_{2}v_{f}^2[/tex] using the law of conservation of kinetic energy:
[tex]m_{2}v_{f}^2 = m_{1}(u_{i} - u_{f})(u_{i} + u_{f}).[/tex]
OK.

Then I find [tex]v_{f}[/tex] using only [tex]u_{i}[/tex], and [tex]u_{f}[/tex]:
[tex]v_{f} =\displaystyle{\frac{-(u_{i}+u_{f})-(u_{i}+u_{f})}{-2}}[/tex]
I have no idea what you are doing here. This expression simplifies to: [itex]v_{f} = u_{i}+u_{f}[/itex], which is incorrect.

You can rewrite the momentum equation to get
[tex]v_{f} = \frac{m_1}{m_2} (u_{i} - u_{f})[/tex]
Perhaps this is what you meant? Now just plug that into the KE equation to eliminate [itex]v_f[/itex] and simplify.



...And here, I think I messed my algebra up, but when I simplify that, I get:
[tex]m_{1}u_{1} = m_{2}(u_{f} + u_{i}) + m_{1}u_{f}[/tex]

Is that right? ...If not/if so, how do I get the [tex]u_{f}[/tex] on just one side?
Amazingly, it is right. (It's equivalent to what you get when you do the "plugging in" that I suggest above.) So I suspect you made a typo earlier on. To simplify this expression, just multiply it out and move all terms containing [itex]u_f[/itex] to one side and all other terms to the other side.
 
woo, okay. thanks. I got it. ...Really, much appreciated.

Thanks again... (Eh, I'm having a really hard time in this class- if you couldn't tell. AND I made the mistake of taking it as a 7-week course. ...I obviously didn't know what I was in for. Really, thanks again.)
 

Similar threads

Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K