Mark Felt Revealed as Deep Throat

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the revelation of Mark Felt as "Deep Throat," the anonymous informant during the Watergate scandal. Participants explore the implications of this identification, the motivations behind Felt's decision to come forward, and the broader impact on media and government accountability.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express relief at the confirmation of Felt's identity, suggesting it provides closure after decades of speculation.
  • Others question the timing of Felt's revelation, speculating it may be linked to personal motivations such as financial support for his family.
  • A participant argues that Felt's actions, while violating his oath, were justified in light of the corruption he witnessed, raising the question of greater moral responsibility.
  • There are claims that Felt's decision to come forward may reflect a response to perceived failures in modern journalism and threats to free speech.
  • Some participants note the historical significance of Felt's actions in shaping the role of the media in holding power accountable, leading to legislative changes like the Whistleblower Act.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential for sensationalism in media coverage and the integrity of journalistic practices today.
  • Several participants discuss the duality of Felt's legacy, debating whether he should be viewed as a hero or a traitor.
  • One participant mentions Felt's fear for his life during the Watergate scandal, suggesting this context is crucial to understanding his motivations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the motivations behind Felt's revelation or the moral implications of his actions. Multiple competing views remain regarding his legacy and the role of the media in political accountability.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions highlight the complexity of moral judgments regarding government officials and the media, suggesting that personal experiences and societal expectations heavily influence these views.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may interest those studying political history, media ethics, or the dynamics of whistleblowing and accountability in government.

Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
8,252
Reaction score
2,664
So it was Mark Felt after all.

Finally, I can sleep. :biggrin:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/31/AR2005053101384.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org
I guess he was waiting until retirement? I thought I had read that Deep Throat would be revealed after he died, which was making some wonder if it was Rehnquist? Finally, after 30 years...
 
Is this for real?
 
Everyone involved agrees, including Felt. This is all confirmed.

russ_watters said:
I smell a book deal.

I should hope, for history's sake if nothing else.
 
Last edited:
Here's the CNN coverage today:
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/06/01/deep.throat/index.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
One of the all time great cloak'n dagger stories. And the model for the X Files' smoking man. Now that's true fame! :biggrin:
 


It is a good thing that we finally have confirmation of the identity of "Deep Throat." I sense he timed this info in consideration of changes/failures in news reporting over the last year that led to the retiring of Dan Rather and Tom Brokaw, unethical media activities that occurred in the 2004 Presidential election, and because of historically dangerous attacks aginst "free speech" and the press by the extreme Republican right. I suspect his health also played a role in his decision to come out now to allow him and others the opportunity to debate and proceed with retrospection. In this respect, we have been given a "gift of opportunity."

The best argument I've heard in support Mark Felt's actions were that he knew the Nixon White House was corrupted and already compromised (of which he was part), and he observed similar conditions at the FBI. Had he gone to either of the FBI, White House, or both, it is conceivable his "information" would have been used to "seal" the cover-up and destruction of evidence necessary prosecution, particularly the White House tapes.

The best argument against his actions have been that he "violated" his oath of secrecy to his post at the FBI, which he clearly did.

The question becomes one of, "Which was the greater violation: Remaining silent and aiding and abetting two corrupt institutions, or, breaching one's FBI oath to protect the greater institution, the Constitution and future of the United States?"

Felt's actions forever created a great new role of "responsibility" of the U.S. media to report on corruption - no matter what level of business or government it may reside. This would later lead Congress to enact the "Whistleblower Act" to protect those in government and business who come forward in such matters. Yet, the press has sadly since been "misused" on occassions as a "tool" to carry out lawless or profitable agendas, and sensationalize news for profit and ratings! Today, many Americans, including myself, question the media's committment to their greater role and the welfare of our nation and Constitution.

As an American, I wish I could entrust our branches of Congress, federal and state agencies, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and the trial courts to carry out their respective oath of duties on important public policy matters that I and other citizens bring forward. Personal experience from 1995 to 2001 demonstrated this NOT to be the case.

So I pose the following question to government and viewers of this discussion: "When government thwarts U.S. law and its oath of duty, for political favor and/or lobby money, and harm is brought on America, what would you ask of us as American citizens?"

Next, I pose this same QUESTION to the U.S. media?

You will find a sugar-coated account of how I received a "known defective CNS Delta (brain) shunt" following a 1992 auto accident on my web site, and the extraordinary lengths I undertook to bring about positive scientific and regulatory changes, only to face Congressional and FDA cover-ups which brought harm to thousands of Americans and an industry. Read "carefully" at www.diaceph.com. This site is a 21st Century effort to bring "constructive progress" to failed American government and business practices.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
McGyver said:
…As an American, I wish I could entrust our branches of Congress, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and the trial courts to carry out their oath of duties on important public policy matters I might bring forward. My experiences from 1995 to 2001 demonstrated that NOT to be the case…

Don’t attribute a higher moral character or a lower one to a government employee or politician, or to the business executive, then you would to the general population. We are all just animals but uniquely gifted with a sense of the future. This gift is what distinguishes us from what we consider the lower species. We recognize there will be a future consequence to our actions. We plan accordingly, driven by synaptic activity unique to each individual, part nature, part nurture. What elicits a joyous sensation in one may elicit fear in another.

Hope for the best but assume the worst and “to thine own self be true”.


...
 
  • #10
i was hearing something about he was trying to gain some publicity money to help fund his grandkids' education lol
 
  • #11


Timing is everything! It's hard for those on the outside to know Mar Felt's real motivation for speaking out now. So look for it to coincide with ...
 
  • #12
Woodward has already finished his book about this.

Whatever the motive, I'm glad that Felt came out before this death. Now all involved can agree or not as to the facts of what took down a President.

And let's be clear, even as the assistant director of the FBI, Felt told Woodward that he feared for his life. He stated that he was afraid that the Nixon machine would have him killed.
 
  • #13
Ivan Seeking said:
Woodward has already finished his book about this.

Whatever the motive, I'm glad that Felt came out before this death. Now all involved can agree or not as to the facts of what took down a President.

And let's be clear, even as the assistant director of the FBI, Felt told Woodward that he feared for his life. He stated that he was afraid that the Nixon machine would have him killed.
I was about to post similarly. The cover-up was so extensive Felt could not have gone any other route. Woodward and Bernstien have expressed relief that Felt has identified himself, therefore preventing possible skepticism as to the truth of who Deep Throat was, as well as why he did what he did.

The question of whether he is a traitor or hero... I say thank goodness the corruption was exposed, and hopefully all politicians will keep this in mind.
 
  • #14
Very perceptive and elloquently spoken, Ivan Seeking. It's a pleasure to be amoung such intelligent company on this forum.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
7K
Replies
39
Views
7K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
6K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K