Calculate Angular Acceleration of Rotating Door

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the angular acceleration of a rotating door made of four glass panes, each with a specified mass. A force is applied to one of the panes, and participants are exploring the relationships between force, mass, and angular acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to apply equations related to tangential force and angular acceleration, questioning the validity of their calculations and the relationships between variables. There is discussion about the correct application of forces and the need for clarity in notation.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into using torque to approach the problem, while others are still clarifying their understanding of the equations involved. There is an ongoing exploration of the correct relationships and calculations, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants have noted the absence of an image that may be crucial for understanding the problem setup. There are also references to specific mathematical notations and constraints regarding the type of physics being discussed.

nutster
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
More questions!
A rotating door is made from four rectangular glass panes, as shown in the drawing. The mass of each pane is 91 kg. A person pushes on the outer edge of one pane with a force of F = 58 N that is directed perpendicular to the pane. Determine the magnitude of the door's angular acceleration.

OK, so equations...

F sub T = mass * alpha sub T,
and alpha sub T = radius * angular accel

So if I try to apply 58N as the tangential force and 364kg as the mass, and solve for alpha sub T, why can't I divide alpha sub T by the radius of the door and get the answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
could you be more clear with your notation?
 
Sorry, I'll give LaTeX a try.
[tex]F_T=m\alpha_T[/tex], and [tex]\alpha_T=ra[/tex], so why doesn't [tex]F_T=mra[/tex]?

If you were to do this, you'd get...

58N=364kg*1.2m*a, right? That's .133, but it's wrong
 
[tex]a = r \alpha[/tex]

[tex]\sum_{i=1}^{n} F_{i} = ma[/tex]
 
Something without integrals, please :) It's trig calc.
 
Sorry, trig physics.
 
That's the sigma notation for summation, that's not an integral... :rolleyes:
 
Sorry, blonde moment. OK, so the only force being applied is the tangential force of 58N...right? So,

[tex]a=\frac{58N}{364kg}[/tex], or 0.159. Applying this value to a, and applying to the other equation, [tex]0.159=1.2m\alpha[/tex];[tex]\alpha=0.1325[/tex]...but that isn't the answer. What have I missed?
 
I won't know what's wrong without the image. So far your original equations were wrong, now it seems you're using "correctly" the right ones.
 
  • #11
bump, please :)
 
  • #12
I would tackle this from a torque perspective. You have a force of 58N acting at a radius of 1.2M. Find the center of mass of the panes and find that point's moment of inertia and used Newton's 2nd Law for torques to find alpha..
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 88 ·
3
Replies
88
Views
24K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
14K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K