Calculate Depth of Floating Instrument: 0.219 kg in Water

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the depth of a floating hollow brass tube loaded with lead shot, with a total mass of 0.219 kg, in water. The formula derived for depth, z, is z = m/(πr²ρ), where m is the mass (0.219 kg), r is the radius (0.01615 m), and ρ is the density of water (1000 kg/m³). A common mistake identified was confusing the symbol "π" with "n," which led to confusion in the calculations. The correct application of the formula yields the depth of the tube's bottom end when floated in water.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics principles, particularly buoyancy.
  • Familiarity with the formula for the area of a circle (A = πr²).
  • Knowledge of density and its units (kg/m³).
  • Basic algebra skills for manipulating equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of buoyancy and Archimedes' principle.
  • Learn how to apply the formula for the area of a circle in practical scenarios.
  • Explore the effects of different densities on floating objects.
  • Investigate the impact of shape and volume on buoyancy calculations.
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, engineers working with fluid dynamics, and anyone interested in understanding buoyancy and floating objects in water.

DDS
Messages
171
Reaction score
0
A hollow brass tube (diameter = 3.23 cm) is sealed at one end and loaded with lead shot to give a total mass of 0.219 kg. When the tube is floated in pure water, what is the depth, z, of its bottom end?

through manipulation of some laws i have broken it down to this stage:

z = m/(πr2ρ)

where:

m=0.219 kg
r=0.0323/2=0.01615m
p=1000 kg/m^3

thus i have :

z= 0.219/ n(0.01615)2(1000)

but what the hell is n... i know its not the incidencs for water because nothing is getting reflected and i just tried to plug it into see what would happen and it doesn't work any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's not"n", it's "pi" (3.1415926535...)

It came from the formula for the area of a circle.
 
thanx so mucn, silly mistake on my part
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
21K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
10K