What is the Significance of Multiple Time Derivatives in Physics?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter robert
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration Derivative
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the significance and implications of multiple time derivatives in physics, particularly focusing on the concepts of jerk and higher derivatives of displacement. Participants explore theoretical aspects, applications in engineering, and potential issues related to causality in different physical frameworks.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the time derivative of acceleration is called 'jerk,' which is significant in engineering contexts, such as roller coaster design.
  • Warren provides a definition of jerk and mentions its units, applications, and the lack of universally agreed terms for higher derivatives of displacement.
  • Another participant points out that while there are infinite time derivatives of position, only the first six are commonly named, with a specific formula for position under constant jerk provided.
  • There is a humorous exchange about the names of higher derivatives, with references to "snap," "crackle," and "pop," though these are acknowledged as non-standard.
  • Daniel raises concerns about the implications of higher time derivatives, specifically mentioning the Lorentz-Dirac reaction force and its causality issues, contrasting this with the absence of such problems in quantum physics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the significance and implications of higher time derivatives. While some clarify definitions and applications, others raise concerns about the theoretical implications, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved on certain points.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the definitions and implications of higher derivatives, as well as the potential issues raised by participants about causality and the applicability of these concepts in different physical theories.

robert
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
If the derivative of displacement if velocity, and the derivative of displacement is acceleration, does the derivative of acceleration give you anything? We were trying to think of something in class today but couldnt.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The time derivative of acceleration is called 'jerk.'

From wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerk):

In physics, jerk (in British English, jolt), also called surge, is the derivative of acceleration with respect to time (or the third derivative of displacement). Yank is mass times jerk, or equivalently, the derivative of force with respect to time. Jerk is a vector, and there is no generally used term to describe its scalar value.

The units of jerk are metres per second cubed (m/s3). There is no universal agreement on the symbol for jerk, but j is commonly used.

Jerk is used at times in engineering, especially when building roller coasters. Some precision or fragile objects—such as passengers, who need time to sense stress changes and adjust their muscle tension, or suffer e.g. whiplash—can be safely subjected not only to a maximum acceleration, but also to a maximum jerk. Jerk may be considered when the excitation of vibrations is a concern.

Higher derivatives of displacement than jerk also exist, but they are rarely necessary, and hence lack agreed names. Many suggestions have been made, such as jilt, jouse and jolt. In development of the Hubble Space Telescope's pointing control system, the fourth derivative of position was considered and the engineers used the word jounce in their publications.

- Warren
 
There are infinite time derivatives of position, but only the first six I think are actually named. The position function for constant jerk becomes

[tex]x(t) = x_0 + v_0 t + \frac{1}{2} at^2 + \frac{1}{6} j t^3[/tex]

Also, the derivative of velocity is acceleration, you seem to have a little mix-up there.
 
Last edited:
The first six? I knew "jerk" but what are the other three?
 
whozum said:
Also, the derivative of velocity is acceleration, you seem to have a little mix-up there.

ya i meant the derivative of velocity is acceleration. i didnt even notice i wrote it wrong though.
 
You know,more time derivatives on the position vector are not welcome for various reasons.Take the Lorentz-Dirac reaction force.It has the third time derivative.It poses problems with the causality.Newtonian physics,however,seems to accommodate the time varying acceleration.Thankfully,in quantum physics the problems generated by more than 2 time derivatives are absent.There's no such thing as force,nor acceleration.

Daniel.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K