How can you use a substitution to solve a quartic equation?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a quartic equation, specifically the equation x^4-x^2+2x^3-6x-3=0, derived from an initial expression involving x. Participants explore various methods and approaches to tackle this problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the potential for numerical methods and graphing to find solutions, while others reference algebraic methods for quartic equations. There is mention of a substitution technique to simplify the quartic into a reduced form, and some participants express confusion about the complexity of the methods involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various perspectives on solving the quartic equation, with some participants suggesting numerical solutions and others advocating for algebraic approaches. There is no explicit consensus on the best method, but several lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express frustration with the complexity of quartic equations and seek clarification on methods, indicating a need for further exploration of the topic. There are references to specific algebraic techniques and the potential for complex solutions.

stupidkid
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
PHP:
Solve for x:
x^2+x^2/(x+1)^2=3
I got the final equation but I am unable to get the it form there.
x^4-x^2+2x^3-6x-3=0
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm afraid there is no simple way to find x - you'll have to use numerical methods. You can find first 2 solutions by graphing this, and the last 2 are complex. I've enclosed the graph that should help you find where your roots are located for real numbers
 
Last edited:
It is incorrect, there is a formula to solve algebraic eqations until the 4 grade.

I have links to italian pages, but, if you try you'll find something in english, too.

The two real solutions are (1+-sqrt(5))/2
 
Last edited:
[tex]x^4+2x^3-x^2-6x-3 = (x^2-x+1)(x^2+3x+3)[/tex]

The first has the solutions above
The second has no real solutions
 
You made a typo, [tex]x^4+2x^3-x^2-6x-3 = (x^2-x-1)(x^2+3x+3)[/tex]
 
Yes, of course!

it's [tex]x^2-x-1[/tex]
 
there is another method to do it though using quadratic equations entirely.
use a2 + b2 = (a - b)2 + 2ab. then put x2/(x+1) = y
 
Is there a actual way to solve these type of sums! PLS I NEED HELP I AM DUMB.
 
stupidkid said:
Is there a actual way to solve these type of sums! PLS I NEED HELP I AM DUMB.

You know, there is a method for solving these "quartic" equations. It's messy and confussing though. I'll describe it in general terms; you can investigate it further if you wish. Consider the general case:

[tex]x^4+bx^3+cx^2+dx+e=0[/tex]

We can make a substitution [itex]x=y-\frac{1}{4}b[/itex] to convert it to a "reduced quartic":

[tex]y^4+qy^2+ry+s=0[/tex]

Can you make that substitution?

Now, assume the reduced quartic can be factored into two quadratics:

[tex]y^4+qy^2+ry+s=(y^2+2ky+l)(y^2-2ky+m)[/tex]

where k,l, and m are to be determined. You can equate coefficients of like powers and end up with two equations for l and m in terms of k. Upon making some additional substitutions you'll end up with a sixth-degree polynomial called the "resolvent cubic":

[tex]64k^6+32qk^4+4(q^2-4s)k^2-r^2=0[/tex]

This resolvent cubic is actually a cubic equation in [itex]k^2[/itex]. Now, you can use the method, equally messy, to solve for a general cubic equation for [itex]k^2[/tex] and then use one value of k to determine l and m, then the quadratics above. <br /> <br /> You're thinking now, "forget that dude, I'll just plug it into Mathematica and call it done". <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":smile:" title="Smile :smile:" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":smile:" />[/itex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K